Skip to content

Title 10 — Armed Forces

Part V · Chapter 322 — Major Systems and Major Defense Acquisition Programs Generally

§ 4212. Risk management and mitigation in major defense acquisition programs and major systems

Statutory text

(a)

Requirement.—

The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the initial acquisition strategy (required under section 4211 of this title) approved by the milestone decision authority and any subsequent revisions include the following:

(1)

A comprehensive approach for managing and mitigating risk (including technical, cost, and schedule risk) during each of the following periods or when determined appropriate by the milestone decision authority:

(A)

The period preceding engineering manufacturing development, or its equivalent.

(B)

The period preceding initial production.

(C)

The period preceding full-rate production.

(2)

An identification of the major sources of risk in each of the periods listed in paragraph (1) to improve programmatic decisionmaking and appropriately minimize and manage program concurrency.

(b)

Approach to Manage and Mitigate Risks.—

The comprehensive approach to manage and mitigate risk included in the acquisition strategy for purposes of subsection (a)(1) shall, at a minimum, include consideration of risk mitigation techniques such as the following:

(1)

Prototyping (including prototyping at the system, subsystem, or component level and competitive prototyping, where appropriate) and, if prototyping at either the system, subsystem, or component level is not used, an explanation of why it is not appropriate.

(2)

Modeling and simulation, the areas that modeling and simulation will assess, and identification of the need for development of any new modeling and simulation tools in order to support the comprehensive strategy.

(3)

Technology demonstrations and decision points for disciplined transition of planned technologies into programs or the selection of alternative technologies.

(4)

Multiple design approaches.

(5)

Alternative designs, including any designs that meet requirements but do so with reduced performance.

(6)

Phasing of program activities or related technology development efforts in order to address high-risk areas as early as feasible.

(7)

Manufacturability and industrial base availability.

(8)

Independent risk element assessments by outside subject matter experts.

(9)

Schedule and funding margins for identified risks.

(c)

Preference for Prototyping.—

To the maximum extent practicable and consistent with the economical use of available financial resources, the milestone decision authority for each major defense acquisition program shall ensure that the acquisition strategy for the program provides for—

(1)

the production of competitive prototypes at the system or subsystem level before Milestone B approval; or

(2)

if the production of competitive prototypes is not practicable, the production of single prototypes at the system or subsystem level.

(d)

Concurrency Defined.—

In this section, the term “concurrency” means, with respect to an acquisition strategy, the combination or overlap of program phases or activities.

Legislative history

Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.

  1. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2016

    Pub. L. 114–92 div. A title VIII § 822(a)(1) · 129 Stat. 726

    Enacted · 10 U.S.C. § 4212

    Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 822(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 900, § 2431b

    Source evidence

    Code source credit
    Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 822(a)(1), Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 900, § 2431b

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (1) In general.— Chapter 144 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by inserting after section 2431a (as added by section 821) the following new section: “§ 2431b. Risk management and mitigation in major defense acquisition programs and major systems “(a) Requirement.— The Secretary of Defense shall ensure that the initial acquisition strategy (required under section 2431a of this title) approved by the milestone decision authority and any subsequent revisions include the following: “(1) A comprehensive approach for managing and mitigating risk (including technical, cost, and schedule risk) during each of the following periods or when determined appropriate by the milestone decision authority: “(A) The period preceding engineering manufacturing development, or its equivalent. “(B) The period preceding initial production. “(C) The period preceding full-rate production. “(2) An identification of the major sources of risk in each of the periods listed in paragraph (1) to improve programmatic decisionmaking and appropriately minimize and manage program concurrency. “(b) Approach to Manage and Mitigate Risks.— The comprehensive approach to manage and mitigate risk included in the acquisition strategy for purposes of subsection (a)(1) shall, at a minimum, include consideration of risk mitigation techniques such as the following: “(1) Prototyping (including prototyping at the system, subsystem, or component level and competitive prototyping, where appropriate) and, if prototyping at either the system, subsystem, or component level is not used, an explanation of why it is not appropriate. “(2) Modeling and simulation, the areas that modeling and simulation will assess, and identification of the need for development of any new modeling and simulation tools in order to support the comprehensive strategy. “(3) Technology demonstrations and decision points for disciplined transition of planned technologies into programs or the selection of alternative technologies. “(4) Multiple design approaches. “(5) Alternative designs, including any designs that meet requirements but do so with reduced performance. “(6) Phasing of program activities or related technology development efforts in order to address high-risk areas as early as feasible. “(7) Manufacturability and industrial base availability. “(8) Independent risk element assessments by outside subject matter experts. “(9) Schedule and funding margins for identified risks. “(c) Preference for Prototyping.— To the maximum extent practicable and consistent with the economical use of available financial resources, the milestone decision authority for each major defense acquisition program shall ensure that the acquisition strategy for the program provides for— “(1) the production of competitive prototypes at the system or subsystem level before Milestone B approval; or “(2) if the production of competitive prototypes is not practicable, the production of single prototypes at the system or subsystem level. “(d) Definitions.— In this section, the terms ‘major defense acquisition program’ and ‘major system’ have the meanings provided in section 2431a of this title.” .

  2. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017

    Pub. L. 114–328 div. A title X § 1081(a)(7) · 130 Stat. 2000

    Amended · 10 U.S.C. § 4212(d)

    Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) defined terms “major defense acquisition program” and “major system”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) defined terms “major defense acquisition program” and “major system”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (7) Subsection (d) of section 2431b is amended to read as follows: “(d) Definitions.— “(1) Concurrency.— The term ‘concurrency’ means, with respect to an acquisition strategy, the combination or overlap of program phases or activities. “(2) Major defense acquisition program and major system.— The terms ‘major defense acquisition program’ and ‘major system’ have the meanings provided in section 2431a of this title.” .

  3. William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021

    Pub. L. 116–283 § 1847(b)(3) · 134 Stat. 3388

    Changed · 10 U.S.C. § 4212

    Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3), renumbered section 2431b of this title as this section

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3), renumbered section 2431b of this title as this section.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (3) Transfer of section 2431b.— Section 2431b of such title is transferred to chapter 322 of such title, as added by subsection (a), inserted after section 4211, as transferred and redesignated by paragraph (1) and amended by paragraph (2), redesignated as section 4212, and amended— (A) in subsection (a), by striking “section 2431a” and inserting “section 4211”; and (B) in subsection (d)— (i) by striking “Definitions.—” and all that follows through “The term” and inserting “Concurrency Defined.—In this section, the term”; and (ii) by striking paragraph (2).

    Effective date note
    Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

  4. William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021

    Pub. L. 116–283 § 1847(b)(3)(A) · 134 Stat. 3388

    Substituted · 10 U.S.C. § 4212(a)

    Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(A), substituted “section 4211” for “section 2431a”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(A), substituted “section 4211” for “section 2431a”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (A) in subsection (a), by striking “section 2431a” and inserting “section 4211”; and

    Effective date note
    Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

  5. William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021

    Pub. L. 116–283 § 1847(b)(3)(B) · 134 Stat. 3388

    1. Substituted · 10 U.S.C. § 4212(d)

      Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(B), substituted “Concurrency Defined” for “Definitions” in subsec. heading

    2. Struck · 10 U.S.C. § 4212(d)

      Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(B), struck out par. (1) designation and heading

    3. Substituted · 10 U.S.C. § 4212(d)

      Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(B), substituted “In this section, the term” for “The term”

    4. Struck · 10 U.S.C. § 4212(d)

      Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(B), struck out par. (2) which defined “major defense acquisition program” and “major system”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(B), substituted “Concurrency Defined” for “Definitions” in subsec. heading, struck out par. (1) designation and heading, substituted “In this section, the term” for “The term”, and struck out par. (2) which defined “major defense acquisition program” and “major system”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (B) in subsection (d)— (i) by striking “Definitions.—” and all that follows through “The term” and inserting “Concurrency Defined.—In this section, the term”; and (ii) by striking paragraph (2).

    Effective date note
    Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective Jan. 1, 2022, with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

8 of 8 references resolved to an enrolled provision

Editorial Notes

Amendments2016–2021 · 2 rounds

2021

Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3), renumbered section 2431b of this title as this section.

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(A), substituted “section 4211” for “section 2431a”.

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 116–283, § 1847(b)(3)(B), substituted “Concurrency Defined” for “Definitions” in subsec. heading, struck out par. (1) designation and heading, substituted “In this section, the term” for “The term”, and struck out par. (2) which defined “major defense acquisition program” and “major system”.

2016

Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 114–328 amended subsec. (d) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (d) defined terms “major defense acquisition program” and “major system”.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 2021 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 116–283 effective , with additional provisions for delayed implementation and applicability of existing law, see section 1801(d) of Pub. L. 116–283, set out as a note preceding section 3001 of this title.

Credits

2015–2021 · 3 acts
  1. 2015Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 822(a)(1), , 129 Stat. 900, § 2431b
  2. 2016amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title X, § 1081(a)(7), , 130 Stat. 2417
  3. 2021renumbered § 4212 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1847(b)(3), , 134 Stat. 4254.
Show as published

(Added Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title VIII, § 822(a)(1), , 129 Stat. 900, § 2431b; amended Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title X, § 1081(a)(7), , 130 Stat. 2417; renumbered § 4212 and amended Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title XVIII, § 1847(b)(3), , 134 Stat. 4254.)

Parsed from the official OLRC USLM XML in data/usc_all/usc10.xml · release point 119-108 · OLRC build 2026-04-17

USLM identifier /us/usc/t10/s4212