Skip to content

Title 15 — Commerce and Trade

Chapter 69 — Cooperative Research

§ 4304. Award of costs, including attorney’s fees, to substantially prevailing party; offset

Statutory text

(a)

Notwithstanding sections 15 and 26 of this title, in any claim under the antitrust laws, or any State law similar to the antitrust laws, based on the conducting of a joint venture, or of a standards development activity engaged in by a standards development organization, the court shall, at the conclusion of the action—

(1)

award to a substantially prevailing claimant the cost of suit attributable to such claim, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, or

(2)

award to a substantially prevailing party defending against any such claim the cost of suit attributable to such claim, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, if the claim, or the claimant’s conduct during the litigation of the claim, was frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith.

(b)

The award made under subsection (a) may be offset in whole or in part by an award in favor of any other party for any part of the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, attributable to conduct during the litigation by any prevailing party that the court finds to be frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith.

(c)

Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply with respect to any person who—

(1)

directly participates in a standards development activity with respect to which a violation of any of the antitrust laws is found,

(2)

is not a fulltime employee of a standards development organization that engaged in such activity, and

(3)

is, or is an employee or agent of a person who is, engaged in a line of commerce that is likely to benefit directly from the operation of the standards development activity with respect to which such violation is found.

Legislative history

Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.

  1. National Cooperative Research Act of 1984

    Pub. L. 98–462 § 5 · 98 Stat. 1815

    Enacted · 15 U.S.C. § 4304

    Pub. L. 98–462, § 5, Oct. 11, 1984, 98 Stat. 1817

    Source evidence

    Code source credit
    Pub. L. 98–462, § 5, Oct. 11, 1984, 98 Stat. 1817

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    Sec. 5. attorney’s fees (a) Notwithstanding sections 4 and 16 of the Clayton Act, in 15 USC 4304. 15 USC 4304. any claim under the antitrust laws, or any State law similar to the antitrust laws, based on the conducting of a joint research and development venture, the court shall, at the conclusion of the action— (1) award to a substantially prevailing claimant the cost of suit attributable to such claim, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, or (2) award to a substantially prevailing party defending against any such claim the cost of suit attributable to such claim, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, if the claim, or the claimant’s conduct during the litigation of the claim, was frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith. (b) The award made under subsection (a) may be offset in whole or in part by an award in favor of any other party for any part of the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee, attributable to conduct during the litigation by any prevailing party that the court finds to be frivolous, unreasonable, without foundation, or in bad faith.

  2. National Cooperative Production Amendments of 1993

    Pub. L. 103–42 § 3(e)(2) · 107 Stat. 117

    Substituted · 15 U.S.C. § 4304(a)

    Pub. L. 103–42 substituted “joint venture” for “joint research and development venture” in introductory provisions

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–42 substituted “joint venture” for “joint research and development venture” in introductory provisions.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (2) in section 5(a) in the matter preceding paragraph (1) 15 USC 4304. by striking “research and development”.

  3. Standards Development Organization Advancement Act of 2004

    Pub. L. 108–237 § 106(1) · 118 Stat. 661

    Inserted · 15 U.S.C. § 4304(a)

    Pub. L. 108–237, § 106(1), inserted “, or of a standards development activity engaged in by a standards development organization” after “joint venture” in introductory provisions

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–237, § 106(1), inserted “, or of a standards development activity engaged in by a standards development organization” after “joint venture” in introductory provisions.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (1) in subsection (a) by inserting “, or of a standards development activity engaged in by a standards development organization” after “joint venture”, and

  4. Standards Development Organization Advancement Act of 2004

    Pub. L. 108–237 § 106(2) · 118 Stat. 661

    Added · 15 U.S.C. § 4304(c)

    Pub. L. 108–237, § 106(2), added subsec. (c)

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–237, § 106(2), added subsec. (c).

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (2) by adding at the end the following: “(c) Subsections (a) and (b) shall not apply with respect to any person who— “(1) directly participates in a standards development activity with respect to which a violation of any of the antitrust laws is found, “(2) is not a fulltime employee of a standards development organization that engaged in such activity, and “(3) is, or is an employee or agent of a person who is, engaged in a line of commerce that is likely to benefit directly from the operation of the standards development activity with respect to which such violation is found.” .

4 of 4 references resolved to an enrolled provision

Editorial Notes

Amendments1993–2004 · 2 rounds

2004

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 108–237, § 106(1), inserted “, or of a standards development activity engaged in by a standards development organization” after “joint venture” in introductory provisions.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 108–237, § 106(2), added subsec. (c).

1993

Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–42 substituted “joint venture” for “joint research and development venture” in introductory provisions.

Credits

1984–2004 · 3 acts
  1. 1984Pub. L. 98–462, § 5, , 98 Stat. 1817
  2. 1993Pub. L. 103–42, § 3(e)(2), , 107 Stat. 119
  3. 2004Pub. L. 108–237, title I, § 106, , 118 Stat. 664.
Show as published

(Pub. L. 98–462, § 5, , 98 Stat. 1817; Pub. L. 103–42, § 3(e)(2), , 107 Stat. 119; Pub. L. 108–237, title I, § 106, , 118 Stat. 664.)

Parsed from the official OLRC USLM XML in data/usc_all/usc15.xml · release point 119-108 · OLRC build 2026-09-09

USLM identifier /us/usc/t15/s4304