Title 16 — Conservation
Chapter 15B — Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration
§ 941c. Identification, review, and implementation of proposals and regional projects
Statutory text
In general
Subject to subsection (b)(2), the Director—
shall encourage the development and, subject to the availability of appropriations, the implementation of fish and wildlife restoration proposals and regional projects based on the results of the Report; and
in cooperation with the State Directors and Indian Tribes, shall identify, develop, and, subject to the availability of appropriations, implement regional projects in the Great Lakes Basin to be administered by Director in accordance with this section.
Identification of proposals and regional projects
Request by the Director
The Director shall annually request that State Directors and Indian Tribes, in cooperation or partnership with other interested entities and in accordance with subsection (a), submit proposals or regional projects for the restoration of fish and wildlife resources.
Requirements for proposals and regional projects
A proposal or regional project under paragraph (1) shall be—
submitted in the manner and form prescribed by the Director; and
consistent with—
the goals of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as amended;
the 1954 Great Lakes Fisheries Convention;
the 1980 Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries, as revised in 1997, and Fish Community Objectives for each Great Lake and connecting water as established under the Joint Strategic Plan;
the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.);
the North American Waterfowl Management Plan and joint ventures established under the plan;
the strategies outlined through the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration authorized under Executive Order 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043; relating to the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force);
the strategic action plan of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative; and
each applicable State wildlife action plan.
Sea lamprey authority
The Great Lakes Fishery Commission shall retain authority and responsibility to formulate and implement a comprehensive program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes Basin.
Review of proposals
Establishment of Committee
There is established the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Proposal Review Committee, which shall operate under the guidance of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service.
Membership and appointment
In general
The Committee shall consist of 2 representatives of each of the State Directors and Indian Tribes, of whom—
1 representative shall be the individual appointed by the State Director or Indian Tribe to the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission; and
1 representative shall have expertise in wildlife management.
Appointments
Each representative shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing State Director or Tribal Chair.
Observer
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall participate as an observer of the Committee.
Recusal
A member of the Committee shall recuse himself or herself from consideration of proposals that the member, or the entity that the member represents, has submitted.
Functions
The Committee shall—
meet at least annually;
review proposals and regional projects developed in accordance with subsection (b) to assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposals and regional projects in fulfilling the purposes of this chapter; and
recommend to the Director any of those proposals and regional projects that should be funded and implemented under this section.
Implementation of proposals and regional projects
In general
After considering recommendations of the Committee and the goals specified in section 941d of this title, the Director shall—
select proposals and regional projects to be implemented; and
subject to the availability of appropriations and subsection (e), fund implementation of the proposals and regional projects.
Selection criteria
In selecting and funding proposals and regional projects, the Director shall take into account the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposals and regional projects in fulfilling the purposes of other laws applicable to restoration of the fish and wildlife resources and habitat of the Great Lakes Basin.
Cost sharing
In general
Non-Federal share
Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project selected under subsection (d) (excluding the cost of establishing sea lamprey barriers) shall be paid in cash or in-kind contributions by non-Federal sources.
Time period for providing match
The non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under subparagraph (A) may be provided at any time during the 2-year period preceding January 1 of the year in which the Director receives the application for the proposal or regional project.
Authorized sources of non-Federal share
In general
The Director may determine the non-Federal share under paragraph (1) by taking into account—
the appraised value of land or a conservation easement as described in subparagraph (B); or
as described in subparagraph (C), the costs associated with—
securing a conservation easement; and
restoration or enhancement of the conservation easement.
Appraisal of conservation easement
In general
The value of a conservation easement may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under paragraph (1)(A) if the Director determines that the conservation easement—
meets the requirements of subsection (b)(2);
is acquired before the end of the grant period of the proposal or regional project;
is held in perpetuity for the conservation purposes of the programs of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service related to the Great Lakes Basin, as described in section 941d of this title, by an accredited land trust or conservancy or a Federal, State, or tribal agency;
is connected either physically or through a conservation planning process to the proposal or regional project; and
is appraised in accordance with clause (ii).
Appraisal
With respect to the appraisal of a conservation easement described in clause (i)—
the appraisal valuation date shall be not later than 1 year after the price of the conservation easement was set under a contract; and
the appraisal shall—
conform to the Uniform Standards of Professional Appraisal Practice (USPAP); and
be completed by a Federal- or State-certified appraiser.
Costs of securing conservation easements
In general
All costs associated with securing a conservation easement and restoration or enhancement of that conservation easement may be used to satisfy the non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under paragraph (1)(A) if the activities and expenses associated with securing the conservation easement and restoration or enhancement of that conservation easement meet the requirements of subparagraph (B)(i).
Inclusion
The costs referred to in clause (i) may include cash, in-kind contributions, and indirect costs.
Exclusion
The costs referred to in clause (i) may not be costs associated with mitigation or litigation (other than costs associated with the Natural Resource Damage Assessment program).
Regional projects
Regional projects selected under subsection (d) shall be exempt from cost sharing if the Director determines that the authorization for the project does not require a non-Federal cost-share.
Exclusion of Federal funds from non-Federal share
The Director may not consider the expenditure, directly or indirectly, of Federal funds received by any entity to be a contribution by a non-Federal source for purposes of this subsection.
Effect on certain Indian tribes
Nothing in this subsection affects an Indian tribe affected by an alternative applicable cost sharing requirement under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.).1
Footnotes
- 1 See References in Text note below.
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990
Pub. L. 101–537 title I § 1005 · 104 Stat. 2370
Enacted · 16 U.S.C. § 941c
Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1005, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2372
Source evidence
Code source credit
Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1005, Nov. 8, 1990, 104 Stat. 2372Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 1005. GREAT LAKES FISHERY RESOURCES RESTORATION STUDY. (a) In General.— The Director shall conduct a comprehensive study of the status of, and the assessment, management, and restoration needs of, the fishery resources of the Great Lakes Basin and shall provide the opportunity for the Secretary, the Administrator, State Directors, Indian Tribes, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, appropriate Canadian Government entities, and other appropriate entities to participate in the study. The Director shall complete the study by October 1, 1994. (b) Memorandum of Understanding.— To provide opportunities for the full participation of all affected entities in the planning and conduct of the study, the Director shall invite the entities identified in subsection (a) to enter into a memorandum of understanding regarding the scope and focus of the study and the responsibilities of each participant for conducting the study. (c) Content of Study.— A study under this section shall include, but not be limited to— (1) identifying and describing the component drainages of the Great Lakes Basin (including the drainage for each of the Great Lakes), analyzing how the characteristics and current or expected land and water uses of those drainages have affected, and can be expected to affect in the future, the fishery resources and fish habitats of the Great Lakes Basin; (2) analyzing historical fishery resource data for the Great Lakes Basin to identify the causes of past and continuing declines of the fishery resources and the impediments to restoring those resources; (3) evaluating the adequacy, effectiveness, and consistency of current Great Lakes interagency fisheries management plans and Federal and State water quality programs, with respect to their effects on Great Lakes fishery resources; (4) analyzing the impacts of, and management control alter-natives for, recently introduced nonindigenous species, including the zebra mussel, the ruffe, and the spiny water flea in accordance with the Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990; (5) developing recommendations regarding— (A) an action plan to analyze the effects of contaminant levels on fishery resources; (B) an action plan for the cooperative restoration and enhancement of depleted, nationally significant fish stocks, including lake trout, yellow perch, lake sturgeon, walleye, forage fish, and Atlantic salmon; (C) planning and technical assistance that should be provided to the, Great Lakes Fisheries Commission, States, and Indian Tribes to assist their fishery resource restoration efforts; (D) mitigation measures to restore and enhance fishery resources adversely affected by past Federal (including federally assisted or approved) water resource development projects and other activities; (E) increasing the involvement of the International Joint Commission, the Great Lakes Commission, the Great Lakes Fishery Commission, and other interjurisdictional entities regarding fishery resources protection, restoration, and enhancement; (F) research projects and data gathering initiatives regarding population trends of fish stocks, including population abundance and structure, interspecific competition, survival rates, and behavioral patterns; (G) important fishery resource habitat and other areas that should be protected, restored, or enhanced for the benefit of Great Lakes fishery resources; (H) how private conservation organizations, recreational and commercial fishing interests, the aquaculture industry, and the general public could contribute to the implementation of the fishery resource restoration and enhancement recommendations developed pursuant to this Act; and (I) appropriate contributions that should be made by States and other non-Federal entities to the cost of activities undertaken to implement the recommendations, including a description of— (i) the activities that shall be cost-shared; (ii) the entities or individuals which shall share the costs of those activities; (iii) the proportion of appropriate project and activity costs that shall be borne by non-Federal interests; and (iv) how the entities or individuals who share costs should finance their contribution. (d) Proposals for Implementing Recommendations.— The Director shall develop proposals for implementing the recommendations of the study developed under subsection (c)(5). The proposals shall be consistent with the goals of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as revised in 1987, the 1954 Great Lakes Fisheries Convention, State and tribal fishery management jurisdiction, and the 1980 Joint Strategic Plan for the management of Great Lakes fishery resources.National Invasive Species Act of 1996
Pub. L. 104–332 § 2(h)(1) · 110 Stat. 4073
Changed · 16 U.S.C. § 941c
Pub. L. 104–332 made technical amendment to Pub. L. 101–646, § 2005, which enacted this section
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 104–332 made technical amendment to Pub. L. 101–646, § 2005, which enacted this section.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) in titles I, II, and IV, by striking the quotation marks 16 USC 4701, 941; 33 USC 2761. at the beginning of any title, subtitle, section, subsection, paragraph, subparagraph, clause, subclause, or undesignated provision;Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1998
Pub. L. 105–265 · 112 Stat. 2358
Amended · 16 U.S.C. § 941c
Pub. L. 105–265 amended section generally
Substituted · 16 U.S.C. § 941c
Pub. L. 105–265 substituting present provisions for provisions requiring a Great Lakes fishery resources restoration study and development of proposals for implementing recommendations
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 105–265 amended section generally, substituting present provisions for provisions requiring a Great Lakes fishery resources restoration study and development of proposals for implementing recommendations.Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 2006
Pub. L. 109–326 § 4 · 120 Stat. 1761
Amended · 16 U.S.C. § 941c
Pub. L. 109–326 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to identification, review, and implementation of proposals
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 109–326 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to identification, review, and implementation of proposals.Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 4. IDENTIFICATION, REVIEW, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSALS. Section 1005 of the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 941c) is amended to read as follows: “SEC. 1005. IDENTIFICATION, REVIEW, AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PROPOSALS AND REGIONAL PROJECTS. “(a) In General.— Subject to subsection (b)(2), the Director— “(1) shall encourage the development and, subject to the availability of appropriations, the implementation of fish and wildlife restoration proposals and regional projects based on the results of the Report; and “(2) in cooperation with the State Directors and Indian Tribes, shall identify, develop, and, subject to the availability of appropriations, implement regional projects in the Great Lakes Basin to be administered by Director in accordance with this section. “(b) Identification of Proposals and Regional Projects.— “(1) Request by the director.— The Director shall annually request that State Directors and Indian Tribes, in cooperation or partnership with other interested entities and in accordance with subsection (a), submit proposals or regional projects for the restoration of fish and wildlife resources. “(2) Requirements for proposals and regional projects.— A proposal or regional project under paragraph (1) shall be— “(A) submitted in the manner and form prescribed by the Director; and “(B) consistent with— “(i) the goals of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement, as amended; “(ii) the 1954 Great Lakes Fisheries Convention; “(iii) the 1980 Joint Strategic Plan for Management of Great Lakes Fisheries, as revised in 1997, and Fish Community Objectives for each Great Lake and connecting water as established under the Joint Strategic Plan; “(iv) the Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990 (16 U.S.C. 4701 et seq.); “(v) the North American Waterfowl Management Plan and joint ventures established under the plan; and “(vi) the strategies outlined through the Great Lakes Regional Collaboration authorized under Executive Order 13340 (69 Fed. Reg. 29043; relating to the Great Lakes Interagency Task Force). “(3) Sea lamprey authority.— The Great Lakes Fishery Commission shall retain authority and responsibility to formulate and implement a comprehensive program to eradicate or minimize sea lamprey populations in the Great Lakes Basin. “(c) Review of Proposals.— “(1) Establishment of committee.— There is established the Great Lakes Fish and Wildlife Restoration Proposal Review Committee, which shall operate under the guidance of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service. “(2) Membership and appointment.— “(A) In general.— The Committee shall consist of 2 representatives of each of the State Directors and Indian Tribes, of whom— “(i) 1 representative shall be the individual appointed by the State Director or Indian Tribe to the Council of Lake Committees of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission; and “(ii) 1 representative shall have expertise in wildlife management. “(B) Appointments.— Each representative shall serve at the pleasure of the appointing State Director or Tribal Chair. “(C) Observer.— The Great Lakes Coordinator of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service shall participate as an observer of the Committee. “(D) Recusal.— A member of the Committee shall recuse himself or herself from consideration of proposals that the member, or the entity that the member represents, has submitted. “(3) Functions.— The Committee shall— “(A) meet at least annually; “(B) review proposals and regional projects developed in accordance with subsection (b) to assess the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposals and regional projects in fulfilling the purposes of this title; and “(C) recommend to the Director any of those proposals and regional projects that should be funded and implemented under this section. “(d) Implementation of Proposals and Regional Projects.— “(1) In general.— After considering recommendations of the Committee and the goals specified in section 1006, the Director shall— “(A) select proposals and regional projects to be implemented; and “(B) subject to the availability of appropriations and subsection (e), fund implementation of the proposals and regional projects. “(2) Selection criteria.— In selecting and funding proposals and regional projects, the Director shall take into account the effectiveness and appropriateness of the proposals and regional projects in fulfilling the purposes of other laws applicable to restoration of the fish and wildlife resources and habitat of the Great Lakes Basin. “(e) Cost Sharing.— “(1) In general.— Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (4), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal selected under subsection (d) (excluding the cost of establishing sea lamprey barriers) shall be paid in cash or in-kind contributions by non-Federal sources. “(2) Regional projects.— Regional projects selected under subsection (d) shall be exempt from cost sharing if the Director determines that the authorization for the project does not require a non-Federal cost-share. “(3) Exclusion of federal funds from non-federal share.— The Director may not consider the expenditure, directly or indirectly, of Federal funds received by any entity to be a contribution by a non-Federal source for purposes of this subsection. “(4) Effect on certain indian tribes.— Nothing in this subsection affects an Indian tribe affected by an alternative applicable cost sharing requirement under the Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act (25 U.S.C. 450 et seq.).” .Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act
Pub. L. 114–322 § 3901(c)(1) · 130 Stat. 1628
Added · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(b)(2)(B)(vii); 16 U.S.C. § 941c(b)(2)(B)(viii)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(1), added cls. (vii) and (viii)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (b)(2)(B)(vii), (viii). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(1), added cls. (vii) and (viii).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) Requirements for proposals and regional projects.— Section 1005(b)(2)(B) (16 U.S.C. 941c(b)(2)(B)) is amended— (A) in clause (v), by striking “and” at the end; (B) in clause (vi), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and (C) by adding at the end the following: “(vii) the strategic action plan of the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative; and “(viii) each applicable State wildlife action plan.” .Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act
Pub. L. 114–322 § 3901(c)(2) · 130 Stat. 1628
Struck · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(c)(2)(C)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(2), struck out “Great Lakes Coordinator of the” before “United States Fish and Wildlife Service”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c)(2)(C). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(2), struck out “Great Lakes Coordinator of the” before “United States Fish and Wildlife Service”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(2) Review of proposals.— Section 1005(c)(2)(C) (16 U.S.C. 941c(c)(2)(C)) is amended by striking “Great Lakes Coordinator of the”.Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act
Pub. L. 114–322 § 3901(c)(3)(A) · 130 Stat. 1628
Amended · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(e)(1)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(A), designated exisiting provisions as subpar. (A)
Inserted · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(e)(1)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(A), inserted heading
Substituted · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(e)(1)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(A), substituted “Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project” for “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (4), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal”
Added · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(e)(1)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(A), added subpar. (B)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(A), designated exisiting provisions as subpar. (A) and inserted heading, substituted “Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project” for “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (4), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal”, and added subpar. (B).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(A) in paragraph (1)— (i) by striking “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (4), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal” and inserting the following: “(A) Non-federal share.— Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project” ; and (ii) by adding at the end the following: “(B) Time period for providing match.— The non-Federal share of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project required under subparagraph (A) may be provided at any time during the 2-year period preceding January 1 of the year in which the Director receives the application for the proposal or regional project.” ;Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act
Pub. L. 114–322 § 3901(c)(3)(B) · 130 Stat. 1628
Added · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(e)(2)(5)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(B), (C), added par. (2)
Redesignated · 16 U.S.C. § 941c(e)(2)(5)
Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(B), (C), redesignated former pars. (2) to (4) as (3) to (5), respectively
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (e)(2) to (5). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(B), (C), added par. (2) and redesignated former pars. (2) to (4) as (3) to (5), respectively.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(B) by redesignating paragraphs (2) through (4) as paragraphs (3) through (5), respectively; and
11 of 13 references resolved to an enrolled provision · 2 partial
Editorial Notes
References in Text
The Nonindigenous Aquatic Nuisance Prevention and Control Act of 1990, referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(B)(iv), is title I of Pub. L. 101–646, , 104 Stat. 4761, which is classified principally to chapter 67 (§ 4701 et seq.) of this title. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 4701 of this title and Tables.
Executive Order 13340, referred to in subsec. (b)(2)(B)(vi), is Ex. Ord. No. 13340, , 69 F.R. 29043, which is set out as a note under section 1268 of Title 33, Navigation and Navigable Waters.
The Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act, referred to in subsec. (e)(5), is Pub. L. 93–638, , 88 Stat. 2203, which was classified principally to subchapter II (§ 450 et seq.) of chapter 14 of Title 25, Indians, prior to editorial reclassification as chapter 46 (§ 5301 et seq.) of Title 25. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see Short Title note set out under section 5301 of Title 25 and Tables.
Codification
Title I of Pub. L. 101–537 and title II of Pub. L. 101–646 enacted substantially identical sections. Title II of Pub. L. 101–646 was repealed by Pub. L. 105–265, § 3(b).
Amendments1996–2016 · 4 rounds
2016
Subsec. (b)(2)(B)(vii), (viii). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(1), added cls. (vii) and (viii).
Subsec. (c)(2)(C). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(2), struck out “Great Lakes Coordinator of the” before “United States Fish and Wildlife Service”.
Subsec. (e)(1). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(A), designated exisiting provisions as subpar. (A) and inserted heading, substituted “Except as provided in paragraphs (3) and (5) and subject to paragraph (2), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal or regional project” for “Except as provided in paragraphs (2) and (4), not less than 25 percent of the cost of implementing a proposal”, and added subpar. (B).
Subsec. (e)(2) to (5). Pub. L. 114–322, § 3901(c)(3)(B), (C), added par. (2) and redesignated former pars. (2) to (4) as (3) to (5), respectively.
2006
Pub. L. 109–326 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section related to identification, review, and implementation of proposals.
1998
Pub. L. 105–265 amended section generally, substituting present provisions for provisions requiring a Great Lakes fishery resources restoration study and development of proposals for implementing recommendations.
1996
Pub. L. 104–332 made technical amendment to Pub. L. 101–646, § 2005, which enacted this section.
Credits
1990–2016 · 6 acts
- 1990Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1005, , 104 Stat. 2372
- 1990Pub. L. 101–646, title II, § 2005, , 104 Stat. 4775
- 1996Pub. L. 104–332, § 2(h)(1), , 110 Stat. 4091
- 1998Pub. L. 105–265, §§ 3(b), 6, , 112 Stat. 2358, 2359
- 2006Pub. L. 109–326, § 4, , 120 Stat. 1762
- 2016Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(c), , 130 Stat. 1848.
Show as published
(Pub. L. 101–537, title I, § 1005, , 104 Stat. 2372; Pub. L. 101–646, title II, § 2005, , 104 Stat. 4775; Pub. L. 104–332, § 2(h)(1), , 110 Stat. 4091; Pub. L. 105–265, §§ 3(b), 6, , 112 Stat. 2358, 2359; Pub. L. 109–326, § 4, , 120 Stat. 1762; Pub. L. 114–322, title III, § 3901(c), , 130 Stat. 1848.)