Title 2 — The Congress
Chapter 25 — Unfunded Mandates Reform
§ 1535. Least burdensome option or explanation required
Statutory text
In general
Except as provided in subsection (b), before promulgating any rule for which a written statement is required under section 1532 of this title, the agency shall identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and from those alternatives select the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule, for—
State, local, and tribal governments, in the case of a rule containing a Federal intergovernmental mandate; and
the private sector, in the case of a rule containing a Federal private sector mandate.
Exception
The provisions of subsection (a) shall apply unless—
the head of the affected agency publishes with the final rule an explanation of why the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome method of achieving the objectives of the rule was not adopted; or
the provisions are inconsistent with law.
OMB certification
No later than 1 year after , the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall certify to Congress, with a written explanation, agency compliance with this section and include in that certification agencies and rulemakings that fail to adequately comply with this section.
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
Pub. L. 104–4 title II § 205 · 109 Stat. 48
Enacted · 2 U.S.C. § 1535
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 205, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 66.)
Source evidence
Code source credit
(Pub. L. 104–4, title II, § 205, Mar. 22, 1995, 109 Stat. 66.)Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 205. LEAST BURDENSOME OPTION OR EXPLANATION REQUIRED. (a) In General.— Except as provided in subsection (b), before promulgating any rule for which a written statement is required under section 202, the agency shall identify and consider a reasonable number of regulatory alternatives and from those alternatives select the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome alternative that achieves the objectives of the rule, for— (1) State, local, and tribal governments, in the case of a rule containing a Federal intergovernmental mandate; and (2) the private sector, in the case of a rule containing a Federal private sector mandate. (b) Exception.— The provisions of subsection (a) shall apply unless— (1) the head of the affected agency publishes with the final rule an explanation of why the least costly, most cost-effective or least burdensome method of achieving the objectives of the rule was not adopted; or (2) the provisions are inconsistent with law. (c) OMB Certification.— No later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Director of the Office of Management and Budget shall certify to Congress, with a written explanation, agency compliance with this section and include in that certification agencies and rulemakings that fail to adequately comply with this section.
1 of 1 references resolved to an enrolled provision