§ 332. Injunction proceedings

Footnotes

1. 1 So in original. Probably should be followed by a comma.

Legislative history

Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.

1. 1938

   Pub. L. 75–675 § 302 · 52 Stat. 1040

   Enacted · 21 U.S.C. § 332

   June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 302, 52 Stat. 1043

   Source evidence

   Code source credit
   June 25, 1938, ch. 675, § 302, 52 Stat. 1043

   Enacted provision · exact public law section
   Sec. 302. injunction proceedings (a) The district courts of the United States and the Jurisdiction. United States courts of the Territories shall have jurisdiction, for cause shown, and subject to the provisions of section 17 (relating to notice to opposite party) of the Act entitled “An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes”, approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U. S. C., 38 Stat. 737. 28 U. S. C. § 381. 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 381), to restrain violations of section 301, except paragraphs (e), (f), (h), (i), and (j). (b) In case of violation of an injunction or restraining order issued Violations of injunctions or restraining orders, proceedings. under this section, which also constitutes a violation of this Act, trial shall be by the court, or, upon demand of the accused, by a jury. Such trial shall be conducted in accordance with the practice and procedure applicable in the case of proceedings subject to the provisions of section 22 of such Act of October 15, 1914, as amended (U. S. C., 38 Stat. 738. 28 U. S. C. § 387. 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 387).

2. 1962

   Drug Amendments of 1962

   Pub. L. 87–781 § 103(d) · 76 Stat. 780

   Struck · 21 U.S.C. § 332(a)

   Pub. L. 87–781, § 103(d), struck out “(e),” after “paragraphs”

   Source evidence

   Code amendment note
   Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 87–781, § 103(d), struck out “(e),” after “paragraphs”.

   Enacted provision · exact public law section
   (d) Section 302(a) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 332(a)) is amended by striking out “(e),”.

   Effective date note
   Amendment by section 103(c) of Pub. L. 87–781 effective on first day of seventh calendar month following October 1962, see section 107 of Pub. L. 87–781, set out as a note under section 321 of this title. Pub. L. 87–781, title II, § 203, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 793, provided that: “The amendments made by this title [amending this section and section 374 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 321 and 374 of this title] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 10, 1962].”

3. 1962

   Drug Amendments of 1962

   Pub. L. 87–781 § 201(c) · 76 Stat. 780

   Struck · 21 U.S.C. § 332(a)

   Pub. L. 87–781, § 201(c), struck out “(f),” after “paragraphs”

   Target inherited from the preceding amendment note.

   Source evidence

   Code amendment note
   Pub. L. 87–781, § 201(c), struck out “(f),” after “paragraphs”.

   Enacted provision · exact public law section
   (c) Section 302(a) of such Act (21 U.S.C. 332(a)) is amended by 52 Stat. 1043. striking out “(f),”.

   Effective date note
   Amendment by section 103(c) of Pub. L. 87–781 effective on first day of seventh calendar month following October 1962, see section 107 of Pub. L. 87–781, set out as a note under section 321 of this title. Pub. L. 87–781, title II, § 203, Oct. 10, 1962, 76 Stat. 793, provided that: “The amendments made by this title [amending this section and section 374 of this title and enacting provisions set out as notes under sections 321 and 374 of this title] shall take effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Oct. 10, 1962].”

4. 1993

   Nutrition Labeling and Education Act Amendments of 1993

   Pub. L. 103–80 § 3(d)(1) · 107 Stat. 773

   Struck · 21 U.S.C. § 332(a)

   Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(d)(1), struck out “, and subject to the provisions of section 17 (relating to notice to opposite party) of the Act entitled ‘An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes’, approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U.S.C., 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 381),” after “for cause shown”

   Source evidence

   Code amendment note
   Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(d)(1), struck out “, and subject to the provisions of section 17 (relating to notice to opposite party) of the Act entitled ‘An Act to supplement existing laws against unlawful restraints and monopolies, and for other purposes’, approved October 15, 1914, as amended (U.S.C., 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 381),” after “for cause shown”.

   Enacted provision · exact public law section
   (1) in subsection (a), by striking out “, and subject to” and all that follows through “381),”, and

5. 1993

   Nutrition Labeling and Education Act Amendments of 1993

   Pub. L. 103–80 § 3(d)(2) · 107 Stat. 773

   Struck · 21 U.S.C. § 332(b)

   Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(d)(2), struck out at end “Such trial shall be conducted in accordance with the practice and procedure applicable in the case of proceedings subject to the provisions of section 22 of such Act of October 15, 1914, as amended (U.S.C., 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 387).”

   Source evidence

   Code amendment note
   Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 103–80, § 3(d)(2), struck out at end “Such trial shall be conducted in accordance with the practice and procedure applicable in the case of proceedings subject to the provisions of section 22 of such Act of October 15, 1914, as amended (U.S.C., 1934 ed., title 28, sec. 387).”

   Enacted provision · exact public law section
   (2) in subsection (b), by striking out the second sentence.

5 of 5 references resolved to an enrolled provision