Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Part IV · Chapter 85 — District Courts; Jurisdiction
§ 1355. Fine, penalty or forfeiture
Statutory text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of any action or proceeding for the recovery or enforcement of any fine, penalty, or forfeiture, pecuniary or otherwise, incurred under any Act of Congress, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.
A forfeiture action or proceeding may be brought in—
the district court for the district in which any of the acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred, or
any other district where venue for the forfeiture action or proceeding is specifically provided for in section 1395 of this title or any other statute.
Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent authority of a foreign government, an action or proceeding for forfeiture may be brought as provided in paragraph (1), or in the United States District court 1 for the District of Columbia.
In any case in which a final order disposing of property in a civil forfeiture action or proceeding is appealed, removal of the property by the prevailing party shall not deprive the court of jurisdiction. Upon motion of the appealing party, the district court or the court of appeals shall issue any order necessary to preserve the right of the appealing party to the full value of the property at issue, including a stay of the judgment of the district court pending appeal or requiring the prevailing party to post an appeal bond.
Any court with jurisdiction over a forfeiture action pursuant to subsection (b) may issue and cause to be served in any other district such process as may be required to bring before the court the property that is the subject of the forfeiture action.
Footnotes
- 1 So in original. Probably should be capitalized.
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Title 28, United States Code, section —
Pub. L. 80–646 · 62 Stat. 869
Enacted · 28 U.S.C. § 1355
June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934
Source evidence
Code source credit
June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934Customs Courts Act of 1980
Pub. L. 96–417 title V § 507 · 94 Stat. 1727
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 507. Section 1355 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting immediately before the period at the end thereof the following: “, except matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title”.Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after Nov. 1, 1980, see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.AnnunzioWylie Anti-Money Laundering Act
Pub. L. 102–550 title XV § 1521 · 106 Stat. 3672
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a)
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1355
Pub. L. 102–550 added subsecs. (b) to (d)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) to (d).Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 1521. JURISDICTION IN CIVIL FORFEITURE CASES. Section 1355 of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (1) by inserting “(a)” before “The district”; and (2) by adding at the end the following new subsections: “(b) (1) A forfeiture action or proceeding may be brought in— “(A) the district court for the district in which any of the acts or omissions giving rise to the forfeiture occurred, or “(B) any other district where venue for the forfeiture action or proceeding is specifically provided for in section 1395 of this title or any other statute. “(2) Whenever property subject to forfeiture under the laws of the United States is located in a foreign country, or has been detained or seized pursuant to legal process or competent authority of a foreign government, an action or proceeding for forfeiture may be brought as provided in paragraph (1), or in the United States District court for the District of Columbia. “(c) in a civil forfeiture action or proceeding is appealed, removal of the property by the prevailing party shall not deprive the court of jurisdiction. Upon motion of the appealing party, the district court or the court of appeals shall issue any order necessary to preserve the right of the appealing party to the full value of the property at issue, including a stay of the judgment of the district court pending appeal or requiring the prevailing party to post an appeal bond. “(d) Any court with jurisdiction over a forfeiture action pursuant to subsection (b) may issue and cause to be served in any other district such process as may be required to bring before the court the property that is the subject of the forfeiture action.”
3 of 4 references resolved to an enrolled provision · 1 partial
Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 41(9) and 371(2) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 24, par. 9, 256, par. 2, 36 Stat. 1092, 1160).
Word “fine” was inserted so that this section will apply to the many provisions in the United States Code for fines which are essentially civil. (See, also, section 2461 of this title and reviser’s note thereunder.)
Words “pecuniary or otherwise” were added to make this section expressly applicable to both pecuniary and property forfeitures. The original section was so construed in Miller v. United States, 1870, 11 Wall. 268, 20 L.Ed. 135; Tyler v. Defrees, 1870, 11 Wall. 331, and The Rosemary, C.C.A. 1928, 26 F.2d 354, certiorari denied 49 S.Ct. 23, 278 U.S. 619, 73 L.Ed. 542.
Changes were made in phraseology.
Editorial Notes
Amendments1980–1992 · 2 rounds
1992
Pub. L. 102–550 designated existing provisions as subsec. (a) and added subsecs. (b) to (d).
1980
Pub. L. 96–417 inserted exception for matters within the jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade under section 1582 of this title.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1980 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–417 applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after the 90th day after , see section 701(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as a note under section 251 of this title.
Credits
1948–1992 · 3 acts
- 1948June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934
- 1980Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 507, , 94 Stat. 1743
- 1992Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, § 1521, , 106 Stat. 4062.
Show as published
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 934; Pub. L. 96–417, title V, § 507, , 94 Stat. 1743; Pub. L. 102–550, title XV, § 1521, , 106 Stat. 4062.)