Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Part IV · Chapter 95 — Court of International Trade
§ 1581. Civil actions against the United States and agencies and officers thereof
Statutory text
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to contest the denial of a protest, in whole or in part, under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced under section 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced under section 516A or 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review—
any final determination of the Secretary of Labor under section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of workers for adjustment assistance under such Act;
any final determination of the Secretary of Commerce under section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of a firm for adjustment assistance under such Act;
any final determination of the Secretary of Commerce under section 273 1 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of a community for adjustment assistance under such Act; and
any final determination of the Secretary of Agriculture under section 293 or 296 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2401b) 1 with respect to the eligibility of a group of agricultural commodity producers for adjustment assistance under such Act.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review any final determination of the Secretary of the Treasury under section 305(b)(1) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action involving an application for an order directing the administering authority or the International Trade Commission to make confidential information available under section 777(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review—
any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to deny a customs broker’s license under section 641(b)(2) or (3) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act;
any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930; and
any decision or order of the Customs Service to deny, suspend, or revoke accreditation of a private laboratory under section 499(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930.
The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review, prior to the importation of the goods involved, a ruling issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, or a refusal to issue or change such a ruling, relating to classification, valuation, rate of duty, marking, restricted merchandise, entry requirements, drawbacks, vessel repairs, or similar matters, but only if the party commencing the civil action demonstrates to the court that he would be irreparably harmed unless given an opportunity to obtain judicial review prior to such importation.
In addition to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Court of International Trade by subsections (a)–(h) of this section and subject to the exception set forth in subsection (j) of this section, the Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United States, its agencies, or its officers, that arises out of any law of the United States providing for—
revenue from imports or tonnage;
tariffs, duties, fees, or other taxes on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the raising of revenue;
embargoes or other quantitative restrictions on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the protection of the public health or safety; or
administration and enforcement with respect to the matters referred to in subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph and subsections (a)–(h) of this section.
This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable by—
the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1516a(a)); or
a binational panel under section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1516a(g)).
The Court of International Trade shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action arising under section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930.
Footnotes
- 1 See References in Text note below.
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Customs Courts Act of 1980
Pub. L. 96–417 title II § 201 · 94 Stat. 1727
Enacted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581
Added Pub. L. 96–417, title II, § 201, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1728
Source evidence
Code source credit
Added Pub. L. 96–417, title II, § 201, Oct. 10, 1980, 94 Stat. 1728Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 201. Chapter 95 of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: “CHAPTER 95— COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE “Sec. “1581. Civil actions against the United States and agencies and officers thereof. “1582. Civil actions commenced by the United States. “1583. Counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party actions. “1584. Cure of defects. “1585. Powers in law and equity. “§1581. Civil actions against the United States and agencies and officers thereof “(a) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to contest the denial of a protest, in 19 USC 1515. whole or in part, under section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930. “(b) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced under section 516 of the Tariff Act 19 USC 1516. of 1930. “(c) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced under section 516A of the Tariff 19 USC 1516a. Act of 1930. “(d) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review— “(1) any final determination of the Secretary of Labor under 19 USC 2273. section 223 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of workers for adjustment assistance under such Act; “(2) any final determination of the Secretary of Commerce 19 USC 2341. under section 251 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of a firm for adjustment assistance under such Act; and “(3) any final determination of the Secretary of Commerce 19 USC 2371. under section 271 of the Trade Act of 1974 with respect to the eligibility of a community for adjustment assistance under such Act. “(e) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review any final determination of the Secretary of the Treasury under section 305(b)(1) of the Trade 19 USC 2515. Agreements Act of 1979. “(f) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action involving an application for an order directing the administering authority or the International Trade Commission to make confidential information available under section 777(c)(2) of 19 USC 1677f. the Tariff Act of 1930. “(g) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review— “(1) any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to deny or revoke a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(a) of the 19 USC 1641. Tariff Act of 1930; and “(2) any order of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. 19 USC 1641. “(h) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review, prior to the importation of the goods involved, a ruling issued by the Secretary of the Treasury, or a refusal to issue or change such a ruling, relating to classification, valuation, rate of duty, marking, restricted merchandise, entry requirements, drawbacks, vessel repairs, or similar matters, but only if the party commencing the civil action demonstrates to the court that he would be irreparably harmed unless given an opportunity to obtain judicial review prior to such importation. “(i) In addition to the jurisdiction conferred upon the Court of International Trade by subsections (a)–(h) of this section and subject to the exception set forth in subsection (j) of this section, the Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced against the United States, its agencies, or its officers, that arises out of any law of the United States providing for— “(1) revenue from imports or tonnage; “(2) tariffs, duties, fees, or other taxes on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the raising of revenue; “(3) embargoes or other quantitative restrictions on the importation of merchandise for reasons other than the protection of the public health or safety; or “(4) administration and enforcement with respect to the matters referred to in paragraphs (1)–(3) of this subsection and subsections (a)–(h) of this section. “(j) The Court of International Trade shall not have jurisdiction of any civil action arising under section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930. 19 USC 1305. “§1582. Civil actions commenced by the United States “The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action which arises out of an import transaction and which is commenced by the United States— “(1) to recover a civil penalty under section 592, 704(i)(2), or 734(i)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930; 19 USC 1592, 1671c, 1673c. “(2) to recover upon a bond relating to the importation of merchandise required by the laws of the United States or by the Secretary of the Treasury; or “(3) to recover customs duties. “§1583. Counterclaims, cross-claims, and third-party actions “In any civil action in the Court of International Trade, the court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to render judgment upon any counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party action of any party, if (1) such claim or action involves the imported merchandise that is the subject matter of such civil action, or (2) such claim or action is to recover upon a bond or customs duties relating to such merchandise. “§1584. Cure of defects “(a) If a civil action within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of International Trade is commenced in a district court of the United States, the district court shall, in the interest of justice, transfer such civil action to the Court of International Trade, where such action shall proceed as if it had been commenced in the Court of International Trade in the first instance. “(b) If a civil action within the exclusive jurisdiction of a district court, a court of appeals, or the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals is commenced in the Court of International Trade, the Court of International Trade shall, in the interest of justice, transfer such civil action to the appropriate district court or court of appeals or to the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals where such action shall proceed as if it had been commenced in such court in the first instance. “§1585. Powers in law and equity “The Court of International Trade shall possess all the powers in law and equity of, or as conferred by statute upon, a district court of the United States.”.Trade and Tariff Act of 1984
Pub. L. 98–573 title II § 212(b)(1) · 98 Stat. 2948
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(g)(1)
Pub. L. 98–573 amended par. (1) generally
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(g)(1)
Pub. L. 98–573 substituting “a customs broker’s license under section 641(b)(2) or (3) or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act” for “or revoke a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 98–573 amended par. (1) generally, substituting “a customs broker’s license under section 641(b)(2) or (3) or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act” for “or revoke a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) Section 1581(g) is amended to read as follows: “(g) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review— “(1) any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to deny a customs broker’s license under section 641(b) (2) or (3) or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or Ante, p. 2978. permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act; and “(2) any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”.Trade and Tariff Act of 1984
Pub. L. 98–573 title II § 212(b)(1) · 98 Stat. 2948
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(g)(2)
Pub. L. 98–573 amended par. (2) generally
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(g)(2)
Pub. L. 98–573 substituting “any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930” for “any order of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 98–573 amended par. (2) generally, substituting “any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930” for “any order of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) Section 1581(g) is amended to read as follows: “(g) The Court of International Trade shall have exclusive jurisdiction of any civil action commenced to review— “(1) any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to deny a customs broker’s license under section 641(b) (2) or (3) or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or Ante, p. 2978. permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act; and “(2) any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”.Tax Reform Act of 1986
Pub. L. 99–514 title XVIII § 1891(1) · 100 Stat. 2085
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(g)(1)
Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “(3)” for “(3) or (c)”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “(3)” for “(3) or (c)”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) by striking out “(3) or (c)” in section 1581(g)(1) and inserting in lieu thereof “(3)”; andUnited States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement Implementation Act of 1988
Pub. L. 100–449 title IV § 402(a) · 102 Stat. 1851
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)
Pub. L. 100–449 temporarily inserted at end “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.” See Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 100–449 temporarily inserted at end “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.” See Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Jurisdiction of Court of International Trade.— Section 1581(i) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following flush sentence: “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”.North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
Pub. L. 103–182 § 684(a)(1) · 107 Stat. 2057
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(g)(3)
Pub. L. 103–182, § 684(a)(1), added par. (3)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 103–182, § 684(a)(1), added par. (3).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) Section 1581(g) is amended by— (A) striking out “and” at the end of paragraph (1); (B) by striking out the period at the end of paragraph (2) and inserting “; and”; and (C) by adding at the end the following: “(3) any decision or order of the Customs Service to deny, suspend, or revoke accreditation of a private laboratory under section 499(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”.North American Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act
Pub. L. 103–182 § 414(a)(1) · 107 Stat. 2057
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)
Pub. L. 103–182, § 414(a)(1), inserted “the North American Free Trade Agreement or” before “the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement” in last sentence
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 103–182, § 414(a)(1), inserted “the North American Free Trade Agreement or” before “the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement” in last sentence.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) in section 1581(i) by inserting “the North American Free Trade Agreement or” before “the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement”;Trade and Globalization Adjustment Assistance Act of 2009
Pub. L. 111–5 div. B title I § 1873(b)(2) · 123 Stat. 115
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(d)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1581(d)(4)
Pub. L. 111–5 substituted “273” for “271” in par. (3)
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(d)(3); 28 U.S.C. § 1581(d)(4)
Pub. L. 111–5 added par. (4)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (d)(3), (4). Pub. L. 111–5 substituted “273” for “271” in par. (3) and added par. (4).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(2) Section 1581(d) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (A) in paragraph (2), by striking “; and” and inserting a semicolon; (B) in paragraph (3)— (i) by striking “271” and inserting “273”; and (ii) by striking the period and inserting “; and”; and (C) by adding at the end the following: “(4) any final determination of the Secretary of Agriculture under section 293 or 296 of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2401b) with respect to the eligibility of a group of agricultural commodity producers for adjustment assistance under such Act.” .Enforce and Protect Act of 2015
Pub. L. 114–125 title IV § 421(b) · 130 Stat. 122
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(c)
Pub. L. 114–125 inserted “or 517” after “516A”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–125 inserted “or 517” after “516A”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(b) Conforming Amendment.— Section 1581(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended by inserting “or 517” after “516A”.United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act
Pub. L. 116–113 § 423(a)(1)(A) · 134 Stat. 11
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)
Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(A), (B), (D), designated existing provisions as par. (1)
Redesignated · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)
Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(A), (B), (D), redesignated former pars. (1) to (4) as subpars. (A) to (D), respectively, of par. (1)
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)
Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(A), (B), (D), added par. (2)
Struck · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)
Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(A), (B), (D), struck out former concluding provisions which read as follows: “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement or the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(A), (B), (D), designated existing provisions as par. (1), redesignated former pars. (1) to (4) as subpars. (A) to (D), respectively, of par. (1), added par. (2), and struck out former concluding provisions which read as follows: “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement or the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(A) by redesignating paragraphs (1) through (4) as subparagraphs (A) through (D), respectively;Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date on which the USMCA enters into force (July 1, 2020), but not applicable to certain determinations under section 1516a of Title 19, Customs Duties, or binational panel reviews under NAFTA, see section 432 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under section 1516a of Title 19.United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement Implementation Act
Pub. L. 116–113 § 423(a)(1)(C) · 134 Stat. 11
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i)(1)(D)
Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(C), substituted “subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph” for “paragraphs (1)–(3) of this subsection”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (i)(1)(D). Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(C), substituted “subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph” for “paragraphs (1)–(3) of this subsection”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(C) in subparagraph (D), as redesignated by subparagraph (A), by striking “paragraphs (1)–(3) of this subsection” and inserting “subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph”; andEffective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date on which the USMCA enters into force (July 1, 2020), but not applicable to certain determinations under section 1516a of Title 19, Customs Duties, or binational panel reviews under NAFTA, see section 432 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under section 1516a of Title 19.
17 of 17 references resolved to an enrolled provision
Notes
Amendment of Section
For termination of amendment by section 501(c) of Pub. L. 100–449, see Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below.
Editorial Notes
Prior History of Court
The United States Customs Court, the predecessor of the Court of International Trade, was omitted in the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–417.
The predecessor of the United States Customs Court was the Board of General Appraisers which was created by the Customs Administrative Act of . The Board was under the administrative supervision of the Secretary of the Treasury.
From 1890 to 1926, the Board of General Appraisers had jurisdiction over all protests from decisions of the collectors of customs and appeals for reappraisement under sections 13 and 14 of the Customs Administrative Act of June 10, 1890, ch. 407, 26 Stat. 136.
The Customs Court was established by act May 28, 1926, ch. 411, §§ 1, 2, 44 Stat. 669, sections 405a and 405b of Title 19, Customs Duties, and said act transferred to it all the jurisdiction and powers of the former Board of General Appraisers. The Tariff Act of June 1930, ch. 497, title IV, § 518, 46 Stat. 737, section 1518 of Title 19, continued the Customs Court as constituted on with, however, several important changes.
References in Text
Section 515 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (a), is classified to section 1515 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Section 516 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (b), is classified to section 1516 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Sections 516A and 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (c), are classified to sections 1516a and 1517 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
The Trade Act of 1974, referred to in subsec. (d), is Pub. L. 93–618, , 88 Stat. 1978, which is classified principally to chapter 12 (§ 2101 et seq.) of Title 19, Customs Duties. Sections 223, 251, 293, and 296 of the Act are classified to sections 2273, 2341, 2401b, and 2401e, respectively, of Title 19. Section 273 of the Act, formerly classified to section 2371b of Title 19, was repealed by Pub. L. 112–40, title II, § 222(a)(1), , 125 Stat. 411. For complete classification of this Act to the Code, see References in Text note set out under section 2101 of Title 19 and Tables.
Section 305(b)(1) of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, referred to in subsec. (e), is classified to section 2515(b)(1) of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Section 777(c)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (f), is classified to section 1677f(c)(2) of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Section 641 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (g)(1), (2), is classified to section 1641 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Section 499(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (g)(3), is classified to section 1499(b) of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Section 305 of the Tariff Act of 1930, referred to in subsec. (j), is classified to section 1305 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Prior Provisions
A prior section 1581, act June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 943, related to powers of the Customs Court generally, prior to the general revision of this chapter by Pub. L. 96–417. See section 1585 of this title.
Amendments1984–2020 · 7 rounds
2020
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(A), (B), (D), designated existing provisions as par. (1), redesignated former pars. (1) to (4) as subpars. (A) to (D), respectively, of par. (1), added par. (2), and struck out former concluding provisions which read as follows: “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the North American Free Trade Agreement or the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.”
Subsec. (i)(1)(D). Pub. L. 116–113, § 423(a)(1)(C), substituted “subparagraphs (A) through (C) of this paragraph” for “paragraphs (1)–(3) of this subsection”.
2016
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–125 inserted “or 517” after “516A”.
2009
Subsec. (d)(3), (4). Pub. L. 111–5 substituted “273” for “271” in par. (3) and added par. (4).
1993
Subsec. (g)(3). Pub. L. 103–182, § 684(a)(1), added par. (3).
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 103–182, § 414(a)(1), inserted “the North American Free Trade Agreement or” before “the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement” in last sentence.
1988
Subsec. (i). Pub. L. 100–449 temporarily inserted at end “This subsection shall not confer jurisdiction over an antidumping or countervailing duty determination which is reviewable either by the Court of International Trade under section 516A(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 or by a binational panel under article 1904 of the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement and section 516A(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930.” See Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment note below.
1986
Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 99–514 substituted “(3)” for “(3) or (c)”.
1984
Subsec. (g)(1). Pub. L. 98–573 amended par. (1) generally, substituting “a customs broker’s license under section 641(b)(2) or (3) or (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, or to deny a customs broker’s permit under section 641(c)(1) of such Act, or to revoke a license or permit under section 641(b)(5) or (c)(2) of such Act” for “or revoke a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930”.
Subsec. (g)(2). Pub. L. 98–573 amended par. (2) generally, substituting “any decision of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customs broker’s license or permit, or impose a monetary penalty in lieu thereof, under section 641(d)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930” for “any order of the Secretary of the Treasury to revoke or suspend a customhouse broker’s license under section 641(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930”.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2020 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 116–113 effective on the date on which the USMCA enters into force (), but not applicable to certain determinations under section 1516a of Title 19, Customs Duties, or binational panel reviews under NAFTA, see section 432 of Pub. L. 116–113, set out as a note under section 1516a of Title 19.
Effective Date of 2016 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 114–125 effective 180 days after , see section 421(c) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1517 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Effective Date of 2009 Amendment
Except as otherwise provided and subject to certain applicability provisions, amendment by Pub. L. 111–5 effective upon the expiration of the 90-day period beginning on , see section 1891 of Pub. L. 111–5, set out as an Effective and Termination Dates of 2009 Amendment note under section 2271 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Effective Date of 1993 Amendment
Amendment by section 414(a)(1) of Pub. L. 103–182 effective on the date the North American Free Trade Agreement enters into force with respect to the United States [], but not applicable to any final determination described in section 1516a(a)(1)(B) or (2)(B)(i), (ii), or (iii) of Title 19, Customs Duties, notice of which is published in the Federal Register before such date, or to a determination described in section 1516a(a)(2)(B)(vi) of Title 19, notice of which is received by the Government of Canada or Mexico before such date, or to any binational panel review under the United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement, or to any extraordinary challenge arising out of any such review, that was commenced before such date, see section 416 of Pub. L. 103–182, formerly set out as an Effective Date note under former section 3431 of Title 19.
Effective and Termination Dates of 1988 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 100–449 effective on date United States-Canada Free-Trade Agreement enters into force (), and to cease to have effect on date Agreement ceases to be in force, see section 501(a), (c) of Pub. L. 100–449, set out in a note under section 2112 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Effective Date of 1984 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 98–573 effective on close of 180th day after , see section 214(d) of Pub. L. 98–573, set out as a note under section 1304 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Effective Date
Chapter effective , and applicable with respect to civil actions pending on or commenced on or after such date, see section 701(a) of Pub. L. 96–417, set out as an Effective Date of 1980 Amendment note under section 251 of this title.
Subsecs. (d) and (g) to (i) of this section applicable with respect to civil actions commenced on or after , see section 701(b)(1)(A) of Pub. L. 96–417.
Application of 1993 Amendment
Pub. L. 103–182, title VI, § 684(b), , 107 Stat 2219, which provided a rule regarding the application of the amendments made by section 684(a) of Pub. L. 103–182 to accreditations of private laboratories, was repealed by Pub. L. 116–113, title VI, § 601, , 134 Stat. 78, effective on the date the USMCA entered into force ().
Transfer of Functions
For transfer of functions, personnel, assets, and liabilities of the United States Customs Service of the Department of the Treasury, including functions of the Secretary of the Treasury relating thereto, to the Secretary of Homeland Security, and for treatment of related references, see sections 203(1), 551(d), 552(d), and 557 of Title 6, Domestic Security, and the Department of Homeland Security Reorganization Plan of , as modified, set out as a note under section 542 of Title 6. For establishment of U.S. Customs and Border Protection in the Department of Homeland Security, treated as if included in Pub. L. 107–296 as of , see section 211 of Title 6, as amended generally by Pub. L. 114–125, and section 802(b) of Pub. L. 114–125, set out as a note under section 211 of Title 6.
Effect of Termination of USMCA Country Status
For provisions relating to effect of termination of USMCA country status on sections 401 to 432 of Pub. L. 116–113, see section 4601 of Title 19, Customs Duties.
Credits
1980–2020 · 8 acts
- 1980Added Pub. L. 96–417, title II, § 201, , 94 Stat. 1728
- 1984amended Pub. L. 98–573, title II, § 212(b)(1), , 98 Stat. 2983
- 1986Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, § 1891(1), , 100 Stat. 2926
- 1988Pub. L. 100–449, title IV, § 402(a), , 102 Stat. 1883
- 1993Pub. L. 103–182, title IV, § 414(a)(1), title VI, § 684(a)(1), , 107 Stat. 2147, 2219
- 2009Pub. L. 111–5, div. B, title I, § 1873(b)(2), , 123 Stat. 414
- 2016Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 421(b), , 130 Stat. 168
- 2020Pub. L. 116–113, title IV, § 423(a)(1), , 134 Stat. 65.
Show as published
(Added Pub. L. 96–417, title II, § 201, , 94 Stat. 1728; amended Pub. L. 98–573, title II, § 212(b)(1), , 98 Stat. 2983; Pub. L. 99–514, title XVIII, § 1891(1), , 100 Stat. 2926; Pub. L. 100–449, title IV, § 402(a), , 102 Stat. 1883; Pub. L. 103–182, title IV, § 414(a)(1), title VI, § 684(a)(1), , 107 Stat. 2147, 2219; Pub. L. 111–5, div. B, title I, § 1873(b)(2), , 123 Stat. 414; Pub. L. 114–125, title IV, § 421(b), , 130 Stat. 168; Pub. L. 116–113, title IV, § 423(a)(1), , 134 Stat. 65.)