Skip to content

Title 33 — Navigation and Navigable Waters

Chapter 36 — Water Resources Development

§ 2242. Remote and subsistence harbors

Statutory text

(a)

In general

In conducting a study of harbor and navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic development benefits if the Secretary determines that—

(1)

the project would be located in the State of Hawaii or Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa; and

(2)
(A)

over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the United States, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest; or

(B)

the long-term viability of the community in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project, would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.

(b)

Justification

In considering whether to recommend a project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the project to any of—

(1)

public health and safety of the local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project, including access to facilities designed to protect public health and safety;

(2)

access to natural resources for subsistence purposes;

(3)

local and regional economic opportunities;

(4)

welfare of the regional population to be served by the project; or

(5)

social and cultural value to the local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project.

(c)

Prioritization

Projects recommended by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall be given equivalent budget consideration and priority as projects recommended solely by national economic development benefits.

(d)

Disposition

(1)

In general

The Secretary may carry out any project identified in the study carried out pursuant to subsection (a) in accordance with the criteria for projects carried out under the authority of the Secretary under section 577 of this title.

(2)

Non-Federal interests

In evaluating and implementing a project under this section, the Secretary shall allow a non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of a project in accordance with the criteria established for flood control projects under section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662; 100 Stat. 4184).

(e)

Annual report

For a project that cannot be carried out under the authority specified in subsection (d), on a determination by the Secretary of the feasibility of the project under subsection (a), the Secretary may include a recommendation concerning the project in the annual report submitted to Congress under section 2282d of this title.

Legislative history

Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.

  1. Water Resources Development Act of 2007

    Pub. L. 110–114 title II § 2006 · 121 Stat. 1041

    Enacted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242

    Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2006, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1073

    Source evidence

    Code source credit
    Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2006, Nov. 8, 2007, 121 Stat. 1073

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    SEC. 2006. REMOTE AND SUBSISTENCE HARBORS. (a) In General.— In conducting a study of harbor and navigation improvements, the Secretary may recommend a project without the need to demonstrate that the project is justified solely by national economic development benefits if the Secretary determines that— (1) (A) the community to be served by the project is at least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port and has no direct rail or highway link to another community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or (B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa; (2) the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the community served by the harbor and navigation improvement; and (3) the long-term viability of the community would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement. (b) Justification.— In considering whether to recommend a project under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider the benefits of the project to— (1) public health and safety of the local community, including access to facilities designed to protect public health and safety; (2) access to natural resources for subsistence purposes; (3) local and regional economic opportunities; (4) welfare of the local population; and (5) social and cultural value to the community.

  2. Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014

    Pub. L. 113–121 § 2104(1)(A) · 128 Stat. 1193

    Inserted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(1)(B)

    Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(A), inserted “or Alaska” after “Hawaii”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(A), inserted “or Alaska” after “Hawaii”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (A) in paragraph (1)(B) by inserting “or Alaska” after “Hawaii”; and

  3. Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014

    Pub. L. 113–121 § 2104(1)(B) · 128 Stat. 1193

    1. Substituted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(2)

      Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(B), substituted “region” for “community”

    2. Inserted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(2)

      Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(B), inserted “, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest” after “improvement”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(B), substituted “region” for “community” and inserted “, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest” after “improvement”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (B) in paragraph (2)— (i) by striking “community” and inserting “region”; and (ii) by inserting “, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest” after “improvement”; and

  4. Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014

    Pub. L. 113–121 § 2104(2) · 128 Stat. 1193

    Added · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(c)(e)

    Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(2), added subsecs. (c) to (e)

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsecs. (c) to (e). Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(2), added subsecs. (c) to (e).

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (2) by adding at the end the following: “(c) Prioritization.— Projects recommended by the Secretary under subsection (a) shall be given equivalent budget consideration and priority as projects recommended solely by national economic development benefits. “(d) Disposition.— “(1) In general.— The Secretary may carry out any project identified in the study carried out pursuant to subsection (a) in accordance with the criteria for projects carried out under the authority of the Secretary under section 107 of the River and Harbor Act of 1960 (33 U.S.C. 577). “(2) Non-federal interests.— In evaluating and implementing a project under this section, the Secretary shall allow a non-Federal interest to participate in the financing of a project in accordance with the criteria established for flood control projects under section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662; 100 Stat. 4184). “(e) Annual Report.— For a project that cannot be carried out under the authority specified in subsection (d), on a determination by the Secretary of the feasibility of the project under subsection (a), the Secretary may include a recommendation concerning the project in the annual report submitted to Congress under section 7001.” .

  5. Water Resources Development Act of 2016

    Pub. L. 114–322 § 1105(1) · 130 Stat. 1628

    Inserted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(3)

    Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(1), inserted “in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project,” after “the community”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(1), inserted “in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project,” after “the community”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (1) in subsection (a)(3) by inserting “in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project,” after “community”; and

  6. Water Resources Development Act of 2016

    Pub. L. 114–322 § 1105(2)(A) · 130 Stat. 1628

    Inserted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(b)(1)

    Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(A), inserted “and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” after “local community”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(A), inserted “and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” after “local community”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (A) in paragraph (1) by inserting “and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” after “community”;

  7. Water Resources Development Act of 2016

    Pub. L. 114–322 § 1105(2)(B) · 130 Stat. 1628

    Substituted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(b)(4)

    Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(B), substituted “regional population to be served by the project” for “local population”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(B), substituted “regional population to be served by the project” for “local population”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (B) in paragraph (4) by striking “local population” and inserting “regional population to be served by the project”; and

  8. Water Resources Development Act of 2016

    Pub. L. 114–322 § 1105(2)(C) · 130 Stat. 1628

    Substituted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(b)(5)

    Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(C), substituted “local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” for “community”

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(C), substituted “local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” for “community”.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (C) in paragraph (5) by striking “community” and inserting “local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project”.

  9. Pub. L. 118–272 § 1147(1) · 138 Stat. 3038

    1. Added · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(1)

      Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), added par. (1)

    2. Struck · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(1)

      Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), struck out former par. (1) which read as follows:

    Unresolved: Pub. L. 118–272 was not found in the local Statutes at Large index.

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows:

    “(1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port and has no direct rail or highway link to another community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or “(B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii or Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa;”.

  10. Pub. L. 118–272 § 1147(1) · 138 Stat. 3038

    1. Added · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(2)

      Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), added par. (2)

    2. Struck · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(2)

      Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the region served by the harbor and navigation improvement, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest; and”

    Unresolved: Pub. L. 118–272 was not found in the local Statutes at Large index.

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the region served by the harbor and navigation improvement, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest; and”.

  11. Pub. L. 118–272 § 1147(1) · 138 Stat. 3038

    Struck · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(a)(3)

    Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), struck out par. (3) which read as follows: “the long-term viability of the community in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project, would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.”

    Unresolved: Pub. L. 118–272 was not found in the local Statutes at Large index.

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), struck out par. (3) which read as follows: “the long-term viability of the community in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project, would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.”

  12. Pub. L. 118–272 § 1147(2)(A) · 138 Stat. 3038

    Substituted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(b)

    Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(2)(A), in introductory provisions, substituted “benefits of the project to any of” for “benefits of the project to”

    Unresolved: Pub. L. 118–272 was not found in the local Statutes at Large index.

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(2)(A), in introductory provisions, substituted “benefits of the project to any of” for “benefits of the project to”.

  13. Pub. L. 118–272 § 1147(2)(B) · 138 Stat. 3038

    Substituted · 33 U.S.C. § 2242(b)(4)

    Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(2)(B), substituted “; or” for “; and”

    Unresolved: Pub. L. 118–272 was not found in the local Statutes at Large index.

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(2)(B), substituted “; or” for “; and”.

9 of 16 references resolved to an enrolled provision · 7 unresolved

Editorial Notes

References in Text

Section 903(c) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 (Public Law 99–662; 100 Stat. 4184), referred to in subsec. (d)(2), is not classified to the Code.

Codification

Section was enacted as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 2007, and not as part of the Water Resources Development Act of 1986 which comprises this chapter.

Amendments2014–2025 · 3 rounds

2025

Subsec. (a)(1). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), added par. (1) and struck out former par. (1) which read as follows:

“(1)(A) the community to be served by the project is at least 70 miles from the nearest surface accessible commercial port and has no direct rail or highway link to another community served by a surface accessible port or harbor; or

“(B) the project would be located in the State of Hawaii or Alaska, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, the United States Virgin Islands, or American Samoa;”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), added par. (2) and struck out former par. (2) which read as follows: “the harbor is economically critical such that over 80 percent of the goods transported through the harbor would be consumed within the region served by the harbor and navigation improvement, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest; and”.

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(1), struck out par. (3) which read as follows: “the long-term viability of the community in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project, would be threatened without the harbor and navigation improvement.”

Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(2)(A), in introductory provisions, substituted “benefits of the project to any of” for “benefits of the project to”.

Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 118–272, § 1147(2)(B), substituted “; or” for “; and”.

2016

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(1), inserted “in which the project is located, or the long-term viability of a community that is located in the region that is served by the project and that will rely on the project,” after “the community”.

Subsec. (b)(1). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(A), inserted “and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” after “local community”.

Subsec. (b)(4). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(B), substituted “regional population to be served by the project” for “local population”.

Subsec. (b)(5). Pub. L. 114–322, § 1105(2)(C), substituted “local community and communities that are located in the region to be served by the project and that will rely on the project” for “community”.

2014

Subsec. (a)(1)(B). Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(A), inserted “or Alaska” after “Hawaii”.

Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(1)(B), substituted “region” for “community” and inserted “, as determined by the Secretary, including consideration of information provided by the non-Federal interest” after “improvement”.

Subsecs. (c) to (e). Pub. L. 113–121, § 2104(2), added subsecs. (c) to (e).

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

“Secretary” Defined

Secretary means the Secretary of the Army, see section 2 of Pub. L. 110–114, set out as a note under section 2201 of this title.

Credits

2007–2025 · 4 acts
  1. 2007Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2006, , 121 Stat. 1073
  2. 2014Pub. L. 113–121, title II, § 2104, , 128 Stat. 1279
  3. 2016Pub. L. 114–322, title I, § 1105, , 130 Stat. 1633
  4. 2025Pub. L. 118–272, div. A, title I, § 1147, , 138 Stat. 3038.
Show as published

(Pub. L. 110–114, title II, § 2006, , 121 Stat. 1073; Pub. L. 113–121, title II, § 2104, , 128 Stat. 1279; Pub. L. 114–322, title I, § 1105, , 130 Stat. 1633; Pub. L. 118–272, div. A, title I, § 1147, , 138 Stat. 3038.)

Parsed from the official OLRC USLM XML in data/usc_all/usc33.xml · release point 119-108 · OLRC build 2026-04-17

USLM identifier /us/usc/t33/s2242