Title 7 — Agriculture
Part G · Chapter 57 — Plant Variety Protection
§ 2462. Civil action against Secretary
Statutory text
An applicant dissatisfied with a decision under section 2443 or 2501 of this title, may, as an alternative to appeal, have remedy by civil action against the Secretary in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Such action shall be commenced within sixty days after such decision or within such further time as the Secretary allows. The court may, in the case of review of a decision by the Secretary refusing plant variety protection, adjudge that such applicant is entitled to receive a certificate of plant variety protection for the variety as specified in the application as the facts of the case may appear, on compliance with the requirements of this chapter.
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Pub. L. 91–577 title II § 72 · 84 Stat. 1542
Enacted · 7 U.S.C. § 2462
Pub. L. 91–577, title II, § 72, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1550
Source evidence
Code source credit
Pub. L. 91–577, title II, § 72, Dec. 24, 1970, 84 Stat. 1550Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 72. Civil Action Against Secretary. An applicant, dissatisfied with a decision under section 63 or 91 of this title, may, as an alternative to appeal, have remedy by civil action against the Secretary in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Such action shall be commenced within sixty days after such decision or within such further time as the Secretary allows. The court, may, in the case of review of a decision by the Secretary refusing plant, variety protection, adjudge that such applicant is entitled to receive a certificate of plant variety protection for his variety as specified in his application as the facts of the case may appear, on compliance with the requirements of this Act.Plant Variety Protection Act Amendments of 1994
Pub. L. 103–349 § 13(k) · 108 Stat. 3136
Substituted · 7 U.S.C. § 2462
Pub. L. 103–349, which directed that the second sentence be amended by substituting “the variety as specified in the application” for “his variety as specified in his application”, was executed by making the substitution in the third sentence, to reflect the probable intent of Congress
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 103–349, which directed that the second sentence be amended by substituting “the variety as specified in the application” for “his variety as specified in his application”, was executed by making the substitution in the third sentence, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(k) The second sentence of section 72 (7 U.S.C. 2462) is amended by striking “his variety as specified in his application” and inserting “the variety as specified in the application”.Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after Oct. 6, 1994, see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
2 of 2 references resolved to an enrolled provision
Editorial Notes
Amendments
1994—Pub. L. 103–349, which directed that the second sentence be amended by substituting “the variety as specified in the application” for “his variety as specified in his application”, was executed by making the substitution in the third sentence, to reflect the probable intent of Congress.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 1994 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 103–349 effective 180 days after , see section 15 of Pub. L. 103–349, set out as a note under section 2401 of this title.
Credits
1970–1994 · 2 acts
Show as published
(Pub. L. 91–577, title II, § 72, , 84 Stat. 1550; Pub. L. 103–349, § 13(k), , 108 Stat. 3143.)