Title 7 — Agriculture
Chapter 103 — Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform
§ 7613. Relevance and merit of agricultural research, extension, and education funded by the Department
Statutory text
Review of National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Peer review of research grants
The Secretary shall establish procedures that provide for scientific peer review of each agricultural research grant administered, on a competitive basis, by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture of the Department.
Relevance and merit review of research, extension, and education grants
Establishment of procedures
The Secretary shall establish procedures that provide for relevance and merit review of each agricultural research, extension, or education grant administered, on a competitive basis, by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture.
Consultation with Advisory Board
The Secretary shall consult with the Advisory Board in establishing the merit review procedures on a continuous basis.
Consideration
Peer and merit review procedures established under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not take the offer or availability of matching funds into consideration.
Advisory Board review
On an annual basis, the Advisory Board shall review—
the relevance to the priorities established under section 7612(a) of this title of the funding of all agricultural research, extension, or education activities conducted or funded by the Department; and
the adequacy of the funding.
Requests for proposals
Review results
As soon as practicable after the review is conducted under subsection (b) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall consider the results of the review when formulating each request for proposals, and evaluating proposals, involving an agricultural research, extension, or education activity funded, on a competitive basis, by the Department.
Input
In formulating a request for proposals described in paragraph (1) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall solicit and consider input from persons who conduct or use agricultural research, extension, or education regarding the prior year’s request for proposals.
Scientific peer review of agricultural research
Peer review procedures
The Secretary shall establish procedures that ensure scientific peer review of all research activities conducted by the Department.
Review panel required
As part of the procedures established under paragraph (1), a review panel shall verify, at least once every 5 years, that each research activity of the Department and research conducted under each research program of the Department has scientific merit and relevance.
Mission area
If the research activity or program to be reviewed is included in the research, educational, and economics mission area of the Department, the review panel shall consider—
the scientific merit and relevance of the activity or research in light of the priorities established pursuant to section 7612 of this title; and
the national or multistate significance of the activity or research.
Composition of review panel
In general
A review panel shall be composed of individuals with scientific expertise, a majority of whom are not employees of the agency whose research is being reviewed.
Scientists from colleges and universities
To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall use scientists from colleges and universities to serve on the review panels.
Submission of results
The results of the panel reviews shall be submitted to the Advisory Board.
Merit review
1862 and 1890 Institutions
Effective , to be eligible to obtain agricultural research or extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each 1862 Institution and 1890 Institution shall—
establish a process for merit review of the activity; and
review the activity in accordance with the process.
1994 Institutions
Effective , to be eligible to obtain agricultural extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each 1994 Institution shall—
establish a process for merit review of the activity; and
review the activity in accordance with the process.
Hispanic-serving agricultural colleges and universities
To be eligible to obtain agricultural extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each Hispanic-serving agricultural college and university shall—
establish a process for merit review of the activity; and
review the activity in accordance with such process.
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998
Pub. L. 105–185 title I § 103 · 112 Stat. 523
Enacted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613
Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 527
Source evidence
Code source credit
Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103, June 23, 1998, 112 Stat. 527Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 103. RELEVANCE AND MERIT OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, EXTENSION, AND EDUCATION FUNDED BY THE DEPARTMENT. (a) Review of Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service.— (1) Peer review of research grants.— The Secretary shall establish procedures that provide for scientific peer review of each agricultural research grant administered, on a competitive basis, by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service of the Department. (2) Merit review of extension and education grants.— (A) Establishment of procedures.— The Secretary shall establish procedures that provide for merit review of each agricultural extension or education grant administered, on a competitive basis, by the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service. (B) Consultation with advisory board.— The Secretary shall consult with the Advisory Board in establishing the merit review procedures. (b) Advisory Board Review.— On an annual basis, the Advisory Board shall review— (1) the relevance to the priorities established under section 102(a) of the funding of all agricultural research, extension, or education activities conducted or funded by the Department; and (2) the adequacy of the funding. (c) Requests for Proposals.— (1) Review results.— As soon as practicable after the review is conducted under subsection (b) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall consider the results of the review when formulating each request for proposals, and evaluating proposals, involving an agricultural research, extension, or education activity funded, on a competitive basis, by the Department. (2) Input.— In formulating a request for proposals described in paragraph (1) for a fiscal year, the Secretary shall solicit and consider input from persons who conduct or use agricultural research, extension, or education regarding the prior year’s request for proposals. (d) Scientific Peer Review of Agricultural Research.— (1) Peer review procedures.— The Secretary shall establish procedures that ensure scientific peer review of all research activities conducted by the Department. (2) Review panel required.— As part of the procedures established under paragraph (1), a review panel shall verify, at least once every 5 years, that each research activity of the Department and research conducted under each research program of the Department has scientific merit and relevance. (3) Mission area.— If the research activity or program to be reviewed is included in the research, educational, and economics mission area of the Department, the review panel shall consider— (A) the scientific merit and relevance of the activity or research in light of the priorities established pursuant to section 102; and (B) the national or multistate significance of the activity or research. (4) Composition of review panel.— (A) In general.— A review panel shall be composed of individuals with scientific expertise, a majority of whom are not employees of the agency whose research is being reviewed. (B) Scientists from colleges and universities.— To the maximum extent practicable, the Secretary shall use scientists from colleges and universities to serve on the review panels. (5) Submission of results.— The results of the panel reviews shall be submitted to the Advisory Board. (e) Merit Review.— (1) 1862 and 1890 institutions.— Effective October 1, 1999, to be eligible to obtain agricultural research or extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each 1862 Institution and 1890 Institution shall— (A) establish a process for merit review of the activity; and (B) review the activity in accordance with the process. (2) 1994 institutions.— Effective October 1, 1999, to be eligible to obtain agricultural extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each 1994 Institution shall— (A) establish a process for merit review of the activity; and (B) review the activity in accordance with the process. (f) Repeal of Provisions for Withholding Funds.— (1) Smith-lever act.— Section 6 of the Smith-Lever Act (7 U.S.C. 346) is repealed. (2) Hatch act of 1887.— Section 7 of the Hatch Act of 1887 (7 U.S.C. 361g) is amended by striking the last paragraph. (3) National agricultural research, extension, and teaching policy act of 1977.— The National Agricultural Research, Extension, and Teaching Policy Act of 1977 is amended— (A) in section 1444 (7 U.S.C. 3221)— (i) by striking subsection (f); and (ii) by redesignating subsection (g) as subsection (f); (B) in section 1445(g) (7 U.S.C. 3222(g)), by striking paragraph (3); and (C) by striking section 1468 (7 U.S.C. 3314).Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
Pub. L. 110–246 § 7511(c)(30) · 122 Stat. 1651
Substituted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7511(c)(30), substituted “National Institute of Food and Agriculture” for “Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” in text of pars. (1) and (2)(A)
Substituted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7511(c)(30), substituted “the National Institute of Food and Agriculture” for “the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” in text of pars. (1) and (2)(A)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–246, § 7511(c)(30), substituted “National Institute of Food and Agriculture” for “Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” in heading and “the National Institute of Food and Agriculture” for “the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” in text of pars. (1) and (2)(A).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(30) Section 103(a) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7613(a)) is amended— (A) in the subsection heading, by striking “Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” and inserting “National Institute of Food and Agriculture”; and (B) in each of paragraphs (1) and (2)(A), by striking “the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” and inserting “the National Institute of Food and Agriculture”.Effective date note
Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title. Amendment by section 7511(c)(30) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 7511(c) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title.Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
Pub. L. 110–246 § 7301 · 122 Stat. 1651
Added · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)(3)
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7301, added par. (3)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 110–246, § 7301, added par. (3).Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 7301. PEER AND MERIT REVIEW. Section 103(a) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7613(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “(3) Consideration.— Peer and merit review procedures established under paragraphs (1) and (2) shall not take the offer or availability of matching funds into consideration.” .Effective date note
Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title. Amendment by section 7511(c)(30) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 7511(c) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title.Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008
Pub. L. 110–246 § 7129(c)(3) · 122 Stat. 1651
Added · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(e)(3)
Pub. L. 110–246, § 7129(c)(3), added par. (3)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (e)(3). Pub. L. 110–246, § 7129(c)(3), added par. (3).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(3) Section 103(e) of the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (7 U.S.C. 7613(e)) is amended by adding at the end the following: “(3) Hispanic-serving agricultural colleges and universities.— To be eligible to obtain agricultural extension funds from the Secretary for an activity, each Hispanic-serving agricultural college and university shall— “(A) establish a process for merit review of the activity; and “(B) review the activity in accordance with such process.” .Effective date note
Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective May 22, 2008, the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title. Amendment by section 7511(c)(30) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective Oct. 1, 2009, see section 7511(c) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title.Agricultural Act of 2014
Pub. L. 113–79 § 7301(1) · 128 Stat. 649
Substituted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)(2)
Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(1), substituted “Relevance and merit review of research, extension,” for “Merit review of extension” in heading
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(1), substituted “Relevance and merit review of research, extension,” for “Merit review of extension” in heading.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) in the heading by striking “Merit review of extension” and inserting “Relevance and merit review of research, extension,”;Agricultural Act of 2014
Pub. L. 113–79 § 7301(2) · 128 Stat. 649
Inserted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)(2)(A)
Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(2), inserted “relevance and” before “merit”
Substituted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)(2)(A)
Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(2), substituted “research, extension, or education” for “extension or education”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(2), inserted “relevance and” before “merit” and substituted “research, extension, or education” for “extension or education”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(2) in subparagraph (A)— (A) by inserting “relevance and” before “merit”; and (B) by striking “extension or education” and inserting “research, extension, or education”; andAgricultural Act of 2014
Pub. L. 113–79 § 7301(3) · 128 Stat. 649
Inserted · 7 U.S.C. § 7613(a)(2)(B)
Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(3), inserted “on a continuous basis” after “procedures”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(2)(B). Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(3), inserted “on a continuous basis” after “procedures”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(3) in subparagraph (B), by inserting “on a continuous basis” after “procedures”.
9 of 9 references resolved to an enrolled provision
Editorial Notes
Codification
Pub. L. 110–234 and Pub. L. 110–246 made identical amendments to this section. The amendments by Pub. L. 110–234 were repealed by section 4(a) of Pub. L. 110–246.
Section is comprised of section 103 of Pub. L. 105–185. Subsec. (f) of section 103 of Pub. L. 105–185 amended sections 361g, 3221, and 3222 of this title and repealed sections 346 and 3314 of this title.
Amendments2008–2014 · 2 rounds
2014
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(1), substituted “Relevance and merit review of research, extension,” for “Merit review of extension” in heading.
Subsec. (a)(2)(A). Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(2), inserted “relevance and” before “merit” and substituted “research, extension, or education” for “extension or education”.
Subsec. (a)(2)(B). Pub. L. 113–79, § 7301(3), inserted “on a continuous basis” after “procedures”.
2008
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 110–246, § 7511(c)(30), substituted “National Institute of Food and Agriculture” for “Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” in heading and “the National Institute of Food and Agriculture” for “the Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service” in text of pars. (1) and (2)(A).
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 110–246, § 7301, added par. (3).
Subsec. (e)(3). Pub. L. 110–246, § 7129(c)(3), added par. (3).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2008 Amendment
Amendment of this section and repeal of Pub. L. 110–234 by Pub. L. 110–246 effective , the date of enactment of Pub. L. 110–234, except as otherwise provided, see section 4 of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as an Effective Date note under section 8701 of this title.
Amendment by section 7511(c)(30) of Pub. L. 110–246 effective , see section 7511(c) of Pub. L. 110–246, set out as a note under section 1522 of this title.
Credits
1998–2014 · 4 acts
- 1998Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103, , 112 Stat. 527
- 2008Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §§ 7129(c)(3), 7301, 7511(c)(30), , 122 Stat. 1227, 1242, 1270
- 2008Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a), title VII, §§ 7129(c)(3), 7301, 7511(c)(30), , 122 Stat. 1664, 1988, 2003, 2031
- 2014Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, § 7301, , 128 Stat. 887.
Show as published
(Pub. L. 105–185, title I, § 103, , 112 Stat. 527; Pub. L. 110–234, title VII, §§ 7129(c)(3), 7301, 7511(c)(30), , 122 Stat. 1227, 1242, 1270; Pub. L. 110–246, § 4(a), title VII, §§ 7129(c)(3), 7301, 7511(c)(30), , 122 Stat. 1664, 1988, 2003, 2031; Pub. L. 113–79, title VII, § 7301, , 128 Stat. 887.)