Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Part IV · Chapter 85 — District Courts; Jurisdiction
§ 1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs
Statutory text
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between—
citizens of different States;
citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State;
citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and
a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.
Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where the plaintiff who files the case originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $75,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff.
For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title—
a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of every State and foreign state by which it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state where it has its principal place of business, except that in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of—
every State and foreign state of which the insured is a citizen;
every State and foreign state by which the insurer has been incorporated; and
the State or foreign state where the insurer has its principal place of business; and
the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent, and the legal representative of an infant or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the infant or incompetent.
In this subsection—
the term “class” means all of the class members in a class action;
the term “class action” means any civil action filed under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative persons as a class action;
the term “class certification order” means an order issued by a court approving the treatment of some or all aspects of a civil action as a class action; and
the term “class members” means the persons (named or unnamed) who fall within the definition of the proposed or certified class in a class action.
The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is a class action in which—
any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State different from any defendant;
any member of a class of plaintiffs is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a State; or
any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state.
A district court may, in the interests of justice and looking at the totality of the circumstances, decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2) over a class action in which greater than one-third but less than two-thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate and the primary defendants are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed based on consideration of—
whether the claims asserted involve matters of national or interstate interest;
whether the claims asserted will be governed by laws of the State in which the action was originally filed or by the laws of other States;
whether the class action has been pleaded in a manner that seeks to avoid Federal jurisdiction;
whether the action was brought in a forum with a distinct nexus with the class members, the alleged harm, or the defendants;
whether the number of citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed in all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate is substantially larger than the number of citizens from any other State, and the citizenship of the other members of the proposed class is dispersed among a substantial number of States; and
whether, during the 3-year period preceding the filing of that class action, 1 or more other class actions asserting the same or similar claims on behalf of the same or other persons have been filed.
A district court shall decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2)—
over a class action in which—
greater than two-thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed;
at least 1 defendant is a defendant—
from whom significant relief is sought by members of the plaintiff class;
whose alleged conduct forms a significant basis for the claims asserted by the proposed plaintiff class; and
who is a citizen of the State in which the action was originally filed; and
principal injuries resulting from the alleged conduct or any related conduct of each defendant were incurred in the State in which the action was originally filed; and
during the 3-year period preceding the filing of that class action, no other class action has been filed asserting the same or similar factual allegations against any of the defendants on behalf of the same or other persons; or
two-thirds or more of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate, and the primary defendants, are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed.
Paragraphs (2) through (4) shall not apply to any class action in which—
the primary defendants are States, State officials, or other governmental entities against whom the district court may be foreclosed from ordering relief; or
the number of members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate is less than 100.
In any class action, the claims of the individual class members shall be aggregated to determine whether the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs.
Citizenship of the members of the proposed plaintiff classes shall be determined for purposes of paragraphs (2) through (6) as of the date of filing of the complaint or amended complaint, or, if the case stated by the initial pleading is not subject to Federal jurisdiction, as of the date of service by plaintiffs of an amended pleading, motion, or other paper, indicating the existence of Federal jurisdiction.
This subsection shall apply to any class action before or after the entry of a class certification order by the court with respect to that action.
Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any class action that solely involves a claim—
concerning a covered security as defined under 16(f)(3) 1 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 78p(f)(3) 2) and section 28(f)(5)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78bb(f)(5)(E));
that relates to the internal affairs or governance of a corporation or other form of business enterprise and that arises under or by virtue of the laws of the State in which such corporation or business enterprise is incorporated or organized; or
that relates to the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties), and obligations relating to or created by or pursuant to any security (as defined under section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)) and the regulations issued thereunder).
For purposes of this subsection and section 1453, an unincorporated association shall be deemed to be a citizen of the State where it has its principal place of business and the State under whose laws it is organized.
For purposes of this subsection and section 1453, a mass action shall be deemed to be a class action removable under paragraphs (2) through (10) if it otherwise meets the provisions of those paragraphs.
As used in subparagraph (A), the term “mass action” means any civil action (except a civil action within the scope of section 1711(2)) in which monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims involve common questions of law or fact, except that jurisdiction shall exist only over those plaintiffs whose claims in a mass action satisfy the jurisdictional amount requirements under subsection (a).
As used in subparagraph (A), the term “mass action” shall not include any civil action in which—
all of the claims in the action arise from an event or occurrence in the State in which the action was filed, and that allegedly resulted in injuries in that State or in States contiguous to that State;
the claims are joined upon motion of a defendant;
all of the claims in the action are asserted on behalf of the general public (and not on behalf of individual claimants or members of a purported class) pursuant to a State statute specifically authorizing such action; or
the claims have been consolidated or coordinated solely for pretrial proceedings.
Any action(s) removed to Federal court pursuant to this subsection shall not thereafter be transferred to any other court pursuant to section 1407, or the rules promulgated thereunder, unless a majority of the plaintiffs in the action request transfer pursuant to section 1407.
This subparagraph will not apply—
to cases certified pursuant to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; or
if plaintiffs propose that the action proceed as a class action pursuant to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The limitations periods on any claims asserted in a mass action that is removed to Federal court pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed tolled during the period that the action is pending in Federal court.
The word “States”, as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Footnotes
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Title 28, United States Code, section —
Pub. L. 80–646 · 62 Stat. 869
Enacted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332
June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 930
Source evidence
Code source credit
June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 930Public Law not identified
Changed · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(b)
Subsec. (b). Act July 26, 1956, included the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Unresolved: No Public Law or Statutes at Large citation in the Code source.
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (b). Act July 26, 1956, included the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.Pub. L. 85–554 § 2 · 72 Stat. 415
Changed · 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pub. L. 85–554 included costs in section catchline
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 85–554 included costs in section catchline.Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 2. That section 1332 of title 28 of the United States Code is amended to read as follows: “§1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs “(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between— “(1) citizens of different States; “(2) citizens of a State, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof; and “(3) citizens of different States and in which foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof are additional parties. “(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where the plaintiff who files the case originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff. “(c) For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business. “(d) The word ‘States’, as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.”Pub. L. 85–554 § 2 · 72 Stat. 415
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
Pub. L. 85–554 substituted “$10,000” for “$3,000”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–554 substituted “$10,000” for “$3,000”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 2. That section 1332 of title 28 of the United States Code is amended to read as follows: “§1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs “(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between— “(1) citizens of different States; “(2) citizens of a State, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof; and “(3) citizens of different States and in which foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof are additional parties. “(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where the plaintiff who files the case originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff. “(c) For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business. “(d) The word ‘States’, as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.”Pub. L. 85–554 § 2 · 72 Stat. 415
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(b)(d)
Pub. L. 85–554 added subsecs. (b) and (c)
Redesignated · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(b)(d)
Pub. L. 85–554 redesignated former subsec. (b) as (d)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 85–554 added subsecs. (b) and (c) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (d).Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 2. That section 1332 of title 28 of the United States Code is amended to read as follows: “§1332. Diversity of citizenship; amount in controversy; costs “(a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions where the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $10,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is between— “(1) citizens of different States; “(2) citizens of a State, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof; and “(3) citizens of different States and in which foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof are additional parties. “(b) Except when express provision therefor is otherwise made in a statute of the United States, where the plaintiff who files the case originally in the Federal courts is finally adjudged to be entitled to recover less than the sum or value of $10,000, computed without regard to any setoff or counterclaim to which the defendant may be adjudged to be entitled, and exclusive of interest and costs, the district court may deny costs to the plaintiff and, in addition, may impose costs on the plaintiff. “(c) For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business. “(d) The word ‘States’, as used in this section, includes the Territories, the District of Columbia, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.”Pub. L. 88–439 § 1 · 78 Stat. 445
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)
Pub. L. 88–439 inserted proviso deeming an insurer of liability insurance, in an action to which the insurer is not joined as a party-defendant, a citizen, of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as the State the insurer has been incorporated by and the State where it has its principal place of business
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 88–439 inserted proviso deeming an insurer of liability insurance, in an action to which the insurer is not joined as a party-defendant, a citizen, of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as the State the insurer has been incorporated by and the State where it has its principal place of business.Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Pub. L. 94–583 § 3 · 90 Stat. 2891
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2)
Pub. L. 94–583 substituted “and citizens or subjects of a foreign state;” for “, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof; and”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 94–583 substituted “and citizens or subjects of a foreign state;” for “, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof; and”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 3. That section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (a) (2) and (3) and substituting in their place the following: “(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state; “(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and “(4) a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.”.Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Pub. L. 94–583 § 3 · 90 Stat. 2891
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(3)
Pub. L. 94–583 substituted “citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and” for “foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof are additional parties”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 94–583 substituted “citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and” for “foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof are additional parties”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 3. That section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (a) (2) and (3) and substituting in their place the following: “(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state; “(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and “(4) a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.”.Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Pub. L. 94–583 § 3 · 90 Stat. 2891
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(4)
Pub. L. 94–583 added par. (4)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 94–583 added par. (4).Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 3. That section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking subsections (a) (2) and (3) and substituting in their place the following: “(2) citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state; “(3) citizens of different States and in which citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and “(4) a foreign state, defined in section 1603(a) of this title, as plaintiff and citizens of a State or of different States.”.Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act
Pub. L. 100–702 § 201(a) · 102 Stat. 4642
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
Pub. L. 100–702, § 201(a), substituted “$50,000” for “$10,000” in introductory text
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702, § 201(a), substituted “$50,000” for “$10,000” in introductory text.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Increase in Amount in Controversy to $50,000.— Subsections (a) and (b) of section 1332 are each amended by striking out “$10,000” and inserting in lieu thereof “$50,000”.Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act
Pub. L. 100–702 § 203(a) · 102 Stat. 4642
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
Pub. L. 100–702, § 203(a), inserted at end “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”
Target inherited from the preceding amendment note.
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 100–702, § 203(a), inserted at end “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Permanent Resident Alien Citizenship for Diversity Purposes.— Section 1332(a) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following: “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”.Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act
Pub. L. 100–702 § 201(a) · 102 Stat. 4642
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(b)
Pub. L. 100–702, § 201(a), substituted “$50,000” for “$10,000”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–702, § 201(a), substituted “$50,000” for “$10,000”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Increase in Amount in Controversy to $50,000.— Subsections (a) and (b) of section 1332 are each amended by striking out “$10,000” and inserting in lieu thereof “$50,000”.Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act
Pub. L. 100–702 § 202(a) · 102 Stat. 4642
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)
Pub. L. 100–702, § 202(a), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: “For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business: Provided further, That in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–702, § 202(a), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: “For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business: Provided further, That in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) In General.— Section 1332(c) is amended to read as follows: “(c) For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title— “(1) Insurance. a corporation shall be deemed to be a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business, except that in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business; and “(2) the legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent, and the legal representative of an infant or incompetent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the infant or incompetent.”.Pub. L. 104–317 title II § 205(a) · 110 Stat. 3847
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a); 28 U.S.C. § 1332(b)
Pub. L. 104–317 substituted “$75,000” for “$50,000”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–317 substituted “$75,000” for “$50,000”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) In General.— Section 1332 of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subsection (a) by striking out “$50,000” and inserting in lieu thereof “$75,000”; and (2) in subsection (b) by striking out “$50,000” and inserting in lieu thereof “$75,000”.Class Action Fairness Act of 2005
Pub. L. 109–2 § 4(a) · 118 Stat. 4
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1332(e)
Pub. L. 109–2 added subsec. (d)
Redesignated · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1332(e)
Pub. L. 109–2 redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 109–2 added subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Application of Federal Diversity Jurisdiction.— Section 1332 is amended— (1) by redesignating subsection (d) as subsection (e); and (2) by inserting after subsection (c) the following: “(d) (1) In this subsection— “(A) the term ‘class’ means all of the class members in a class action; “(B) the term ‘class action’ means any civil action filed under rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or similar State statute or rule of judicial procedure authorizing an action to be brought by 1 or more representative persons as a class action; “(C) the term ‘class certification order’ means an order issued by a court approving the treatment of some or all aspects of a civil action as a class action; and “(D) the term ‘class members’ means the persons (named or unnamed) who fall within the definition of the proposed or certified class in a class action. “(2) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action in which the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and is a class action in which— “(A) any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State different from any defendant; “(B) any member of a class of plaintiffs is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state and any defendant is a citizen of a State; or “(C) any member of a class of plaintiffs is a citizen of a State and any defendant is a foreign state or a citizen or subject of a foreign state. “(3) A district court may, in the interests of justice and looking at the totality of the circumstances, decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2) over a class action in which greater than one-third but less than two-thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate and the primary defendants are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed based on consideration of— “(A) whether the claims asserted involve matters of national or interstate interest; “(B) whether the claims asserted will be governed by laws of the State in which the action was originally filed or by the laws of other States; “(C) whether the class action has been pleaded in a manner that seeks to avoid Federal jurisdiction; “(D) whether the action was brought in a forum with a distinct nexus with the class members, the alleged harm, or the defendants; “(E) whether the number of citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed in all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate is substantially larger than the number of citizens from any other State, and the citizenship of the other members of the proposed class is dispersed among a substantial number of States; and “(F) whether, during the 3-year period preceding the filing of that class action, 1 or more other class actions asserting the same or similar claims on behalf of the same or other persons have been filed. “(4) A district court shall decline to exercise jurisdiction under paragraph (2)— “(A) (i) over a class action in which— “(I) greater than two-thirds of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed; “(II) at least 1 defendant is a defendant— “(aa) from whom significant relief is sought by members of the plaintiff class; “(bb) whose alleged conduct forms a significant basis for the claims asserted by the proposed plaintiff class; and “(cc) who is a citizen of the State in which the action was originally filed; and “(III) principal injuries resulting from the alleged conduct or any related conduct of each defendant were incurred in the State in which the action was originally filed; and “(ii) during the 3-year period preceding the filing of that class action, no other class action has been filed asserting the same or similar factual allegations against any of the defendants on behalf of the same or other persons; or “(B) two-thirds or more of the members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate, and the primary defendants, are citizens of the State in which the action was originally filed. “(5) Paragraphs (2) through (4) shall not apply to any class action in which— “(A) the primary defendants are States, State officials, or other governmental entities against whom the district court may be foreclosed from ordering relief; or “(B) the number of members of all proposed plaintiff classes in the aggregate is less than 100. “(6) In any class action, the claims of the individual class members shall be aggregated to determine whether the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $5,000,000, exclusive of interest and costs. “(7) Citizenship of the members of the proposed plaintiff classes shall be determined for purposes of paragraphs (2) through (6) as of the date of filing of the complaint or amended complaint, or, if the case stated by the initial pleading is not subject to Federal jurisdiction, as of the date of service by plaintiffs of an amended pleading, motion, or other paper, indicating the existence of Federal jurisdiction. “(8) This subsection shall apply to any class action before or after the entry of a class certification order by the court with respect to that action. “(9) Paragraph (2) shall not apply to any class action that solely involves a claim— “(A) concerning a covered security as defined under 16(f)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 78p(f)(3)) and section 28(f)(5)(E) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78bb(f)(5)(E)); “(B) that relates to the internal affairs or governance of a corporation or other form of business enterprise and that arises under or by virtue of the laws of the State in which such corporation or business enterprise is incorporated or organized; or “(C) that relates to the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties), and obligations relating to or created by or pursuant to any security (as defined under section 2(a)(1) of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77b(a)(1)) and the regulations issued thereunder). “(10) For purposes of this subsection and section 1453, an unincorporated association shall be deemed to be a citizen of the State where it has its principal place of business and the State under whose laws it is organized. “(11) (A) For purposes of this subsection and section 1453, a mass action shall be deemed to be a class action removable under paragraphs (2) through (10) if it otherwise meets the provisions of those paragraphs. “(B) (i) As used in subparagraph (A), the term ‘mass action’ means any civil action (except a civil action within the scope of section 1711(2)) in which monetary relief claims of 100 or more persons are proposed to be tried jointly on the ground that the plaintiffs’ claims involve common questions of law or fact, except that jurisdiction shall exist only over those plaintiffs whose claims in a mass action satisfy the jurisdictional amount requirements under subsection (a). “(ii) As used in subparagraph (A), the term ‘mass action’ shall not include any civil action in which— “(I) all of the claims in the action arise from an event or occurrence in the State in which the action was filed, and that allegedly resulted in injuries in that State or in States contiguous to that State; “(II) the claims are joined upon motion of a defendant; “(III) all of the claims in the action are asserted on behalf of the general public (and not on behalf of individual claimants or members of a purported class) pursuant to a State statute specifically authorizing such action; or “(IV) the claims have been consolidated or coordinated solely for pretrial proceedings. “(C) (i) Any action(s) removed to Federal court pursuant to this subsection shall not thereafter be transferred to any other court pursuant to section 1407, or the rules promulgated thereunder, unless a majority of the plaintiffs in the action request transfer pursuant to section 1407. “(ii) This subparagraph will not apply— “(I) to cases certified pursuant to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; or “(II) if plaintiffs propose that the action proceed as a class action pursuant to rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. “(D) The limitations periods on any claims asserted in a mass action that is removed to Federal court pursuant to this subsection shall be deemed tolled during the period that the action is pending in Federal court.” .Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 101(1) · 125 Stat. 758
Struck · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 101(1), struck out concluding provisions which read as follows: “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–63, § 101(1), struck out concluding provisions which read as follows: “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) by striking the last sentence; andEffective date note
Pub. L. 112–63, title I, § 105, Dec. 7, 2011, 125 Stat. 762, provided that:Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 101(2) · 125 Stat. 758
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(2)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 101(2), inserted before semicolon at end “, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 112–63, § 101(2), inserted before semicolon at end “, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(2) in paragraph (2), by inserting after “foreign state” the following: “, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State”.Effective date note
Pub. L. 112–63, title I, § 105, Dec. 7, 2011, 125 Stat. 762, provided that:Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 102 · 125 Stat. 758
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 102, substituted “every State and foreign state” for “any State”
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 102, substituted “it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state” for “it has been incorporated and of the State”
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 102, substituted “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of—” for “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business; and”
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 102, added subpars. (A) to (C)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 112–63, § 102, substituted “every State and foreign state” for “any State”, “it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state” for “it has been incorporated and of the State”, and “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of—” for “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business; and” and added subpars. (A) to (C).Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 102. CITIZENSHIP OF CORPORATIONS AND INSURANCE COMPANIES WITH FOREIGN CONTACTS. Section 1332(c)(1) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking “any State” and inserting “every State and foreign state”; (2) by striking “the State” and inserting “the State or foreign state”; and (3) by striking all that follows “party-defendant,” and inserting “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of— “(A) every State and foreign state of which the insured is a citizen; “(B) every State and foreign state by which the insurer has been incorporated; and “(C) the State or foreign state where the insurer has its principal place of business; and” .Effective date note
Pub. L. 112–63, title I, § 105, Dec. 7, 2011, 125 Stat. 762, provided that:
20 of 23 references resolved to an enrolled provision · 2 partial · 1 unresolved
Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., § 41(1) (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, § 24, par. 1, 36 Stat. 1091; May 14, 1934, ch. 283, § 1, 48 Stat. 775; Aug. 21, 1937, ch. 726, § 1, 50 Stat. 738; Apr. 20, 1940, ch. 117, 54 Stat. 143).
Other provisions of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., are incorporated in sections 1331, 1341, 1342, 1345, 1354, and 1359 of this title. (See reviser’s notes under said sections.)
Jurisdiction conferred by other sections of this chapter, except section 1335, is not dependent upon diversity of citizenship. (See annotations under former section 41 of title 28, U.S.C.A., and 35 C.J.S., p. 833 et seq. §§ 30–43. See, also, reviser’s note under section 1331 of this title.) As to citizenship of bank where jurisdiction depends upon diversity of citizenship, see section 1348 of this title.
Words “all civil actions” were substituted for “all suits of a civil nature, at common law or in equity” in order to conform to Rule 2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Words “or citizens of the District of Columbia, Territory of Hawaii, or Alaska, and any State or Territory” which were inserted by the amendatory act , are omitted. The word “States” is defined in this section and enumeration of the references is unnecessary.
The revised section conforms with the views of Philip F. Herrick, United States Attorney, Puerto Rico, who observed that the act of , permitted action between a citizen of Hawaii and of Puerto Rico, but not between a citizen of New York and Puerto Rico, in the district court.
This changes the law to insure uniformity. The 1940 amendment applied only to the provision as to controversies between “citizens of different States.” The new definition in subsection (b) extends the 1940 amendment to apply to controversies between citizens of the Territories or the District of Columbia, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof.
The diversity of citizenship language of section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as amended in 1940, was described as ambiguous in McGarry v. City of Bethlehem, 45 F.Supp. 385, 386. In that case the 1940 amendment was held unconstitutional insofar as it affected the District of Columbia. However, two other district courts upheld the amendment. Winkler v. Daniels, D.C.Va. 1942, 43 F.Supp. 265; Glaeser v. Acacia Mutual Life Ass’n., D.C.Cal. 1944, 55 F.Supp. 925.
This section is intended to cover all diversity of citizenship instances in civil actions in accordance with the judicial construction of the language in the original section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Therefore, the revised language covers civil actions between—
Citizens of a State, and citizens of other States and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof;
Citizens of a Territory or the District of Columbia, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof;
Citizens of different States;
Citizens of different Territories;
Citizens of a State, and citizens of Territories;
Citizens of a State or Territory, and citizens of the District of Columbia;
Citizens of a State, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof.
The revised section removes an uncertainty referred to in the McGarry case, supra, as to whether Congress intended to permit citizens of the Territories or the District of Columbia to sue a State or Territory itself rather than the citizens thereof. The court observed that “Congress could hardly have had such intention.”
The sentence “The foregoing provisions as to the sum or value of the matter in controversy shall not be construed to apply to any of the cases mentioned in the succeeding paragraphs of this section” was omitted as unnecessary. Those paragraphs are (2)–(28) of said section 41 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which are revised and incorporated in this chapter and, except for those relating to actions against the United States and interpleader, contains no provision as to a sum or value necessary to confer jurisdiction. Consequently the omitted sentence is covered by excluding such requirement.
Section 41(1) of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., as originally enacted, purported to include all jurisdictional provisions relating to the district courts. Subsequently, many special jurisdictional provisions were enacted and incorporated in other titles of the U.S.C., 1940 ed., as follows:
Title Section 7 209 7 210 7 216 7 292 7 499g 7 608a(6) 7 608c(15)(B) 7 610(b)(2) 7 648 7 1175 7 1365—1367 7 1376 7 1508(c) 8 164 8 701 8 903 9 4 9 8 9 9 11 11(a) 11 46 11 205(a), (l) 11 401 11 511 11 512 11 514—516 11 711 11 712 11 811 11 812 11 1011 11 1012 11 1013 11 1200 12 93 12 195 12 632 15 4 15 9 15 15 15 25 15 26 15 31 15 53 15 68e 15 77t 15 77v 15 77vvv 15 78u(e) 15 78u(f) 15 78aa 15 79k(d), (e) 15 79r(f), (g) 15 80a–25 15 80a–34 15 80a–35 15 80a–41(c), (e) 15 80a–43 15 80b–14 15 97 15 99 15 433 15 715d(c) 15 715i 15 717s 15 717u 16 10 16 583e 16 820 16 825m 16 825n 16 825p 17 26 17 34 21 193 21 332 21 355 25 314 25 345 26 3633 26 3800 27 207 29 101 29 103—109 29 160(e) 29 216 29 217 30 188 31 232 33 495 33 918 33 921 35 63 35 66 35 67 35 72a 35 90 38 445 40 257 40 270b 40 361 41 113(b)(2) 42 405(c)(5), (g) 43 546 43 1062 45 56 45 88 45 89 45 153(p) 45 159 45 185 45 228j(b)4 45 228k 45 268 45 355(f) 46 597 46 688 46 711 46 741 et seq. 46 781 et seq. 46 941(c) 46 951 46 954 46 1114(c) 46 1128d 47 11 47 13 47 33 47 36 47 207 47 401 47 406 47 407 48 242 48 245 49 5(8) 49 9 49 16(2) 49 16(9) 49 16(12) 49 17(9) 49 19a(l) 49 20(9) 49 23 49 26(h) 49 41(1), (3) 49 43 49 181(b), (c) 49 305(g) 49 322(b) 49 647 49 916 49 1017 49 1021 50 23 D.C. Code 11–305—11–307 D.C. Code 11–309 D.C. Code 11–324
Editorial Notes
References in Text
Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, referred to in subsec. (d)(1)(B), (11)(C)(ii), is set out in the Appendix to this title.
Amendments1956–2011 · 8 rounds
2011
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–63, § 101(1), struck out concluding provisions which read as follows: “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 112–63, § 101(2), inserted before semicolon at end “, except that the district courts shall not have original jurisdiction under this subsection of an action between citizens of a State and citizens or subjects of a foreign state who are lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States and are domiciled in the same State”.
Subsec. (c)(1). Pub. L. 112–63, § 102, substituted “every State and foreign state” for “any State”, “it has been incorporated and of the State or foreign state” for “it has been incorporated and of the State”, and “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of—” for “such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business; and” and added subpars. (A) to (C).
2005
Subsecs. (d), (e). Pub. L. 109–2 added subsec. (d) and redesignated former subsec. (d) as (e).
1996
Subsecs. (a), (b). Pub. L. 104–317 substituted “$75,000” for “$50,000”.
1988
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702, § 201(a), substituted “$50,000” for “$10,000” in introductory text.
Pub. L. 100–702, § 203(a), inserted at end “For the purposes of this section, section 1335, and section 1441, an alien admitted to the United States for permanent residence shall be deemed a citizen of the State in which such alien is domiciled.”
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 100–702, § 201(a), substituted “$50,000” for “$10,000”.
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 100–702, § 202(a), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, subsec. (c) read as follows: “For the purposes of this section and section 1441 of this title, a corporation shall be deemed a citizen of any State by which it has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business: Provided further, That in any direct action against the insurer of a policy or contract of liability insurance, whether incorporated or unincorporated, to which action the insured is not joined as a party-defendant, such insurer shall be deemed a citizen of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as of any State by which the insurer has been incorporated and of the State where it has its principal place of business.”
1976
Subsec. (a)(2). Pub. L. 94–583 substituted “and citizens or subjects of a foreign state;” for “, and foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof; and”.
Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 94–583 substituted “citizens or subjects of a foreign state are additional parties; and” for “foreign states or citizens or subjects thereof are additional parties”.
Subsec. (a)(4). Pub. L. 94–583 added par. (4).
1964
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 88–439 inserted proviso deeming an insurer of liability insurance, in an action to which the insurer is not joined as a party-defendant, a citizen, of the State of which the insured is a citizen, as well as the State the insurer has been incorporated by and the State where it has its principal place of business.
1958
Pub. L. 85–554 included costs in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 85–554 substituted “$10,000” for “$3,000”.
Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 85–554 added subsecs. (b) and (c) and redesignated former subsec. (b) as (d).
1956
Subsec. (b). Act , included the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Pub. L. 112–63, title I, § 105, , 125 Stat. 762, provided that:
“(a) In General.—
Subject to subsection (b), the amendments made by this title [enacting section 1455 of this title and amending this section and sections 1441, 1446, and 1453 of this title] shall take effect upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act [], and shall apply to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date.
“(b) Treatment of Cases Removed to Federal Court.—
For purposes of subsection (a), an action or prosecution commenced in State court and removed to Federal court shall be deemed to commence on the date the action or prosecution was commenced, within the meaning of State law, in State court.”
Effective Date of 2005 Amendment
Pub. L. 109–2, § 9, , 119 Stat. 14, provided that: “The amendments made by this Act [enacting chapter 114 and section 1453 of this title and amending this section and sections 1335 and 1603 of this title] shall apply to any civil action commenced on or after the date of enactment of this Act [].”
Effective Date of 1996 Amendment
Pub. L. 104–317, title II, § 205(b), , 110 Stat. 3850, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall take effect 90 days after the date of enactment of this Act [].”
Effective Date of 1988 Amendment
Pub. L. 100–702, title II, § 201(b), , 102 Stat. 4646, provided that: “The amendments made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to any civil action commenced on or after the 180th day after the date of enactment of this title [].”
Pub. L. 100–702, title II, § 202(b), , 102 Stat. 4646, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to any civil action commenced in or removed to a United States district court on or after the 180th day after the date of enactment of this title [].”
Pub. L. 100–702, title II, § 203(b), , 102 Stat. 4646, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply to claims in civil actions commenced in or removed to the United States district courts on or after the 180th day after the date of enactment of this title [].”
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–583 effective 90 days after , see section 8 of Pub. L. 94–583, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1602 of this title.
Effective Date of 1964 Amendment
Pub. L. 88–439, § 2, , 78 Stat. 445, provided that: “The amendment made by this Act to section 1332(c), title 28, United States Code, applies only to causes of action arising after the date of enactment of this Act [].”
Effective Date of 1958 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 85–554 applicable only in the case of actions commenced after , see section 3 of Pub. L. 85–554, set out as a note under section 1331 of this title.
Credits
1948–2011 · 9 acts
- 1948June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 930
- 1956July 26, 1956, ch. 740, 70 Stat. 658
- 1958Pub. L. 85–554, § 2, , 72 Stat. 415
- 1964Pub. L. 88–439, § 1, , 78 Stat. 445
- 1976Pub. L. 94–583, § 3, , 90 Stat. 2891
- 1988Pub. L. 100–702, title II, §§ 201(a), 202(a), 203(a), , 102 Stat. 4646
- 1996Pub. L. 104–317, title II, § 205(a), , 110 Stat. 3850
- 2005Pub. L. 109–2, § 4(a), , 119 Stat. 9
- 2011Pub. L. 112–63, title I, §§ 101, 102, , 125 Stat. 758.
Show as published
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 930; July 26, 1956, ch. 740, 70 Stat. 658; Pub. L. 85–554, § 2, , 72 Stat. 415; Pub. L. 88–439, § 1, , 78 Stat. 445; Pub. L. 94–583, § 3, , 90 Stat. 2891; Pub. L. 100–702, title II, §§ 201(a), 202(a), 203(a), , 102 Stat. 4646; Pub. L. 104–317, title II, § 205(a), , 110 Stat. 3850; Pub. L. 109–2, § 4(a), , 119 Stat. 9; Pub. L. 112–63, title I, §§ 101, 102, , 125 Stat. 758.)