Title 28 — Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
Part IV · Chapter 89 — District Courts; Removal of Cases from State Courts
§ 1441. Removal of civil actions
Statutory text
Generally.—
Except as otherwise expressly provided by Act of Congress, any civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant or the defendants, to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.
Removal Based on Diversity of Citizenship.—
In determining whether a civil action is removable on the basis of the jurisdiction under section 1332(a) of this title, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.
A civil action otherwise removable solely on the basis of the jurisdiction under section 1332(a) of this title may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.
Joinder of Federal Law Claims and State Law Claims.—
If a civil action includes—
a claim arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States (within the meaning of section 1331 of this title), and
a claim not within the original or supplemental jurisdiction of the district court or a claim that has been made nonremovable by statute,
the entire action may be removed if the action would be removable without the inclusion of the claim described in subparagraph (B).
Upon removal of an action described in paragraph (1), the district court shall sever from the action all claims described in paragraph (1)(B) and shall remand the severed claims to the State court from which the action was removed. Only defendants against whom a claim described in paragraph (1)(A) has been asserted are required to join in or consent to the removal under paragraph (1).
Actions Against Foreign States.—
Any civil action brought in a State court against a foreign state as defined in section 1603(a) of this title may be removed by the foreign state to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. Upon removal the action shall be tried by the court without jury. Where removal is based upon this subsection, the time limitations of section 1446(b) of this chapter may be enlarged at any time for cause shown.
Multiparty, Multiforum Jurisdiction.—
Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, a defendant in a civil action in a State court may remove the action to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action is pending if—
the action could have been brought in a United States district court under section 1369 of this title; or
the defendant is a party to an action which is or could have been brought, in whole or in part, under section 1369 in a United States district court and arises from the same accident as the action in State court, even if the action to be removed could not have been brought in a district court as an original matter.
The removal of an action under this subsection shall be made in accordance with section 1446 of this title, except that a notice of removal may also be filed before trial of the action in State court within 30 days after the date on which the defendant first becomes a party to an action under section 1369 in a United States district court that arises from the same accident as the action in State court, or at a later time with leave of the district court.
Whenever an action is removed under this subsection and the district court to which it is removed or transferred under section 1407(j) 1 has made a liability determination requiring further proceedings as to damages, the district court shall remand the action to the State court from which it had been removed for the determination of damages, unless the court finds that, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice, the action should be retained for the determination of damages.
Any remand under paragraph (2) shall not be effective until 60 days after the district court has issued an order determining liability and has certified its intention to remand the removed action for the determination of damages. An appeal with respect to the liability determination of the district court may be taken during that 60-day period to the court of appeals with appellate jurisdiction over the district court. In the event a party files such an appeal, the remand shall not be effective until the appeal has been finally disposed of. Once the remand has become effective, the liability determination shall not be subject to further review by appeal or otherwise.
Any decision under this subsection concerning remand for the determination of damages shall not be reviewable by appeal or otherwise.
An action removed under this subsection shall be deemed to be an action under section 1369 and an action in which jurisdiction is based on section 1369 of this title for purposes of this section and sections 1407, 1697, and 1785 of this title.
Nothing in this subsection shall restrict the authority of the district court to transfer or dismiss an action on the ground of inconvenient forum.
Derivative Removal Jurisdiction.—
The court to which a civil action is removed under this section is not precluded from hearing and determining any claim in such civil action because the State court from which such civil action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim.
Footnotes
- 1 So in original. Section 1407 of this title does not contain a subsec. (j).
Legislative history
Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.
Title 28, United States Code, section —
Pub. L. 80–646 · 62 Stat. 869
Enacted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 937
Source evidence
Code source credit
June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 937Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976
Pub. L. 94–583 § 6 · 90 Stat. 2891
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d)
Pub. L. 94–583 added subsec. (d)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 94–583 added subsec. (d).Enacted provision · exact public law section
Sec. 6. That section 1441 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new subsection: “(d) Any civil action brought in a State court against a foreign state as defined in section 1603(a) of this title may be removed by the foreign state to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending. Upon removal the action shall be tried by the court without jury. Where removal is based upon this subsection, the time limitations of 28 USC 1446. section 1446(b) of this chapter may be enlarged at any time for cause shown.”.Pub. L. 99–336 § 3(a) · 100 Stat. 633
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(e)
Pub. L. 99–336 added subsec. (e)
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 99–336 added subsec. (e).Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Section 1441 Amendment.— Section 1441 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection: “(e) The court to which such civil action is removed is not precluded from hearing and determining any claim in such civil action because the State court from which such civil action is removed did not have jurisdiction over that claim.”.Judicial Improvements and Access to Justice Act
Pub. L. 100–702 title X § 1016(a) · 102 Stat. 4642
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)
Pub. L. 100–702 inserted at end “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702 inserted at end “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(a) Actions Removable Generally.— Section 1441(a) is amended by adding at the end thereof the following new sentence: “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”.Federal Courts Study Committee Implementation Act of 1990
Pub. L. 101–650 title III § 312 · 104 Stat. 5089
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)
Pub. L. 101–650 substituted “within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title” for “, which would be removable if sued upon alone”
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)
Pub. L. 101–650 substituted “may remand all matters in which State law predominates” for “remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–650 substituted “within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title” for “, which would be removable if sued upon alone” and “may remand all matters in which State law predominates” for “remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 312. REMOVAL OF SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT CLAIMS. Section 1441(c) of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (1) by striking out “, which would be removable if sued upon alone” and inserting in lieu thereof “within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title”; and (2) by striking out “remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction” and inserting in lieu thereof “may remand all matters in which State law predominates”.Pub. L. 102–198 § 4 · 105 Stat. 1623
Struck · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)
Pub. L. 102–198 struck out comma after “title”
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)
Pub. L. 102–198 substituted “may” for “may may” before “remand”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–198 struck out comma after “title” and substituted “may” for “may may” before “remand”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
SEC. 4. REMOVAL OF SEPARATE AND INDEPENDENT CLAIMS. Section 1441(c) of title 28, United States Code, as amended by section 312 of the Judicial Improvements Act of 1990, is amended by— (1) striking the comma after “title”; and (2) striking “may may” and inserting “may”.Multiparty, Multiforum Trial Jurisdiction Act of 2002
Pub. L. 107–273 div. C title I § 11020(b)(3) · 116 Stat. 1758
Added · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(e); 28 U.S.C. § 1441(f)
Pub. L. 107–273 added subsec. (e)
Redesignated · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(e); 28 U.S.C. § 1441(f)
Pub. L. 107–273 redesignated former subsec. (e) as (f)
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(e); 28 U.S.C. § 1441(f)
Pub. L. 107–273 substituted “The court to which a civil action is removed under this section” for “The court to which such civil action is removed”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 107–273 added subsec. (e), redesignated former subsec. (e) as (f), and substituted “The court to which a civil action is removed under this section” for “The court to which such civil action is removed”.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(3) Removal of actions.— Section 1441 of title 28, United States Code, is amended— (A) in subsection (e) by striking “(e) The court to which such civil action is removed” and inserting “(f) The court to which a civil action is removed under this section”; and (B) by inserting after subsection (d) the following new subsection: “(e) (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, a defendant in a civil action in a State court may remove the action to the district court of the United States for the district and division embracing the place where the action is pending if— “(A) the action could have been brought in a United States district court under section 1369 of this title; or “(B) the defendant is a party to an action which is or could have been brought, in whole or in part, under section 1369 in a United States district court and arises from the same accident as the action in State court, even if the action to be removed could not have been brought in a district court as an original matter. The removal of an action under this subsection shall be made in accordance with section 1446 of this title, except that a notice of removal may also be filed before trial of the action in State court within 30 days after the date on which the defendant first becomes a party to an action under section 1369 in a United States district court that arises from the same accident as the action in State court, or at a later time with leave of the district court. “(2) Whenever an action is removed under this subsection and the district court to which it is removed or transferred under section 1407(j) has made a liability determination requiring further proceedings as to damages, the district court shall remand the action to the State court from which it had been removed for the determination of damages, unless the court finds that, for the convenience of parties and witnesses and in the interest of justice, the action should be retained for the determination of damages. “(3) Any remand under paragraph (2) shall not be effective until 60 days after the district court has issued an order determining liability and has certified its intention to remand the removed action for the determination of damages. An appeal with respect to the liability determination of the district court may be taken during that 60-day period to the court of appeals with appellate jurisdiction over the district court. In the event a party files such an appeal, the remand shall not be effective until the appeal has been finally disposed of. Once the remand has become effective, the liability determination shall not be subject to further review by appeal or otherwise. “(4) Any decision under this subsection concerning remand for the determination of damages shall not be reviewable by appeal or otherwise. “(5) An action removed under this subsection shall be deemed to be an action under section 1369 and an action in which jurisdiction is based on section 1369 of this title for purposes of this section and sections 1407, 1697, and 1785 of this title. “(6) Nothing in this subsection shall restrict the authority of the district court to transfer or dismiss an action on the ground of inconvenient forum.”.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(1) · 125 Stat. 759
Substituted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(1), substituted “Removal of civil actions” for “Actions removable generally” in section catchline
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(1), substituted “Removal of civil actions” for “Actions removable generally” in section catchline.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(1) The section heading is amended by striking “Actions removable generally” and inserting “Removal of civil actions”.Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(2) · 125 Stat. 759
Struck and inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(2), inserted heading and in text struck out at end “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(2), inserted heading and in text struck out at end “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(2) Subsection (a) is amended— (A) by striking “(a) Except” and inserting “(a) Generally.—Except”; and (B) by striking the last sentence;Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(3) · 125 Stat. 759
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(3), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties. Any other such action shall be removable only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(3), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties. Any other such action shall be removable only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(3) Subsection (b) is amended to read as follows: “(b) Removal Based on Diversity of Citizenship.— (1) In determining whether a civil action is removable on the basis of the jurisdiction under section 1332(a) of this title, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded. “(2) A civil action otherwise removable solely on the basis of the jurisdiction under section 1332(a) of this title may not be removed if any of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.” .Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(4) · 125 Stat. 759
Amended · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(c)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(4), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters in which State law predominates.”
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(4), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters in which State law predominates.”Enacted provision · exact public law section
(4) Subsection (c) is amended to read as follows: “(c) Joinder of Federal Law Claims and State Law Claims.— (1) If a civil action includes— “(A) a claim arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States (within the meaning of section 1331 of this title), and “(B) a claim not within the original or supplemental jurisdiction of the district court or a claim that has been made nonremovable by statute, the entire action may be removed if the action would be removable without the inclusion of the claim described in subparagraph (B). “(2) Upon removal of an action described in paragraph (1), the district court shall sever from the action all claims described in paragraph (1)(B) and shall remand the severed claims to the State court from which the action was removed. Only defendants against whom a claim described in paragraph (1)(A) has been asserted are required to join in or consent to the removal under paragraph (1).” .Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(5) · 125 Stat. 759
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(d)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(5), inserted heading
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(5), inserted heading.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(5) Subsection (d) is amended by striking “(d) Any” and inserting “(d) Actions Against Foreign States.—Any”.Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(6) · 125 Stat. 759
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(e)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(6), inserted heading
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(6), inserted heading.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(6) Subsection (e) is amended by striking “(e)(1) Notwithstanding” and inserting “(e) Multiparty, Multiforum Jurisdiction.—(1) Notwithstanding”.Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.Federal Courts Jurisdiction and Venue Clarification Act of 2011
Pub. L. 112–63 § 103(a)(7) · 125 Stat. 759
Inserted · 28 U.S.C. § 1441(f)
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(7), inserted heading
Source evidence
Code amendment note
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(7), inserted heading.Enacted provision · exact public law section
(7) Subsection (f) is amended by striking “(f) The court” and inserting “(f) Derivative Removal Jurisdiction.—The court”.Effective date note
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on Dec. 7, 2011, and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.
17 of 18 references resolved to an enrolled provision · 1 partial
Notes
Historical and Revision Notes
Based on title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 71, 114 (Mar. 3, 1911, ch. 231, §§ 28, 53, 36 Stat. 1094, 1101; Jan. 20, 1914, ch. 11, 38 Stat. 278; Jan. 31, 1928, ch. 14, § 1, 45 Stat. 54).
Section consolidates removal provisions of sections 71 and 114 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and is intended to resolve ambiguities and conflicts of decisions.
Phrases such as “in suits of a civil nature, at law or in equity,” the words “case,” “cause,” “suit,” and the like have been omitted and the words “civil action” substituted in harmony with Rules 2 and 81(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Ambiguous phrases such as “the District Court of the United States for the proper district” have been clarified by the substitution of the phrase “the district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.” (See General Investment Co. v. Lake Shore & M.S. Ry. Co., 1922, 43 S.Ct. 107, 112, 260 U.S. 261, 67 L.Ed. 244 and cases cited therein.)
All the provisions with reference to removal of controversies between citizens of different States because of inability, from prejudice or local influence, to obtain justice, have been discarded. These provisions, born of the bitter sectional feelings engendered by the Civil War and the Reconstruction period, have no place in the jurisprudence of a nation since united by three wars against foreign powers. Indeed, the practice of removal for prejudice or local influence has not been employed much in recent years.
Subsection (c) has been substituted for the provision in section 71 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., “and when in any suit mentioned in this section, there shall be a controversy which is wholly between citizens of different States, and which can be fully determined as between them, then either one or more of the defendants actually interested in such controversy may remove said suit into the district court of the United States.”
This quoted language has occasioned much confusion. The courts have attempted to distinguish between separate and separable controversies, a distinction which is sound in theory but illusory in substance. (See 41 Harv. L. Rev. 1048; 35 Ill. L. Rev. 576.)
Subsection (c) permits the removal of a separate cause of action but not of a separable controversy unless it constitutes a separate and independent claim or cause of action within the original jurisdiction of United States District Courts. In this respect it will somewhat decrease the volume of Federal litigation.
Rules 18, 20, and 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permit the most liberal joinder of parties, claims, and remedies in civil actions. Therefore there will be no procedural difficulty occasioned by the removal of the entire action. Conversely, if the court so desires, it may remand to the State court all nonremovable matters.
The provisions of section 71 of title 28, U.S.C., 1940 ed., with respect to removal of actions under the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (U.S.C., 1940 ed., title 45, Railroads, §§ 51–60) and actions against a carrier for loss, damage, or delay to shipments under section 20 of title 49, U.S.C., 1940 ed., Transportation, are incorporated in section 1445 of this title.
Editorial Notes
Amendments1976–2011 · 7 rounds
2011
Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(1), substituted “Removal of civil actions” for “Actions removable generally” in section catchline.
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(2), inserted heading and in text struck out at end “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”
Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(3), amended subsec. (b) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Any civil action of which the district courts have original jurisdiction founded on a claim or right arising under the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States shall be removable without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties. Any other such action shall be removable only if none of the parties in interest properly joined and served as defendants is a citizen of the State in which such action is brought.”
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(4), amended subsec. (c) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows: “Whenever a separate and independent claim or cause of action within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title is joined with one or more otherwise non-removable claims or causes of action, the entire case may be removed and the district court may determine all issues therein, or, in its discretion, may remand all matters in which State law predominates.”
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(5), inserted heading.
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(6), inserted heading.
Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 112–63, § 103(a)(7), inserted heading.
2002
Subsecs. (e), (f). Pub. L. 107–273 added subsec. (e), redesignated former subsec. (e) as (f), and substituted “The court to which a civil action is removed under this section” for “The court to which such civil action is removed”.
1991
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 102–198 struck out comma after “title” and substituted “may” for “may may” before “remand”.
1990
Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 101–650 substituted “within the jurisdiction conferred by section 1331 of this title” for “, which would be removable if sued upon alone” and “may remand all matters in which State law predominates” for “remand all matters not otherwise within its original jurisdiction”.
1988
Subsec. (a). Pub. L. 100–702 inserted at end “For purposes of removal under this chapter, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be disregarded.”
1986
Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 99–336 added subsec. (e).
1976
Subsec. (d). Pub. L. 94–583 added subsec. (d).
Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries
Effective Date of 2011 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 112–63 effective upon the expiration of the 30-day period beginning on , and applicable to any action or prosecution commenced on or after such effective date, with provisions for treatment of cases removed to Federal court, see section 105 of Pub. L. 112–63, set out as a note under section 1332 of this title.
Effective Date of 2002 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 107–273 applicable to a civil action if the accident giving rise to the cause of action occurred on or after the 90th day after , see section 11020(c) of Pub. L. 107–273, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1369 of this title.
Effective Date of 1986 Amendment
Pub. L. 99–336, § 3(b), , 100 Stat. 637, provided that: “The amendment made by this section [amending this section] shall apply with respect to claims in civil actions commenced in State courts on or after the date of the enactment of this section [].”
Effective Date of 1976 Amendment
Amendment by Pub. L. 94–583 effective 90 days after , see section 8 of Pub. L. 94–583, set out as an Effective Date note under section 1602 of this title.
Credits
1948–2011 · 8 acts
- 1948June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 937
- 1976Pub. L. 94–583, § 6, , 90 Stat. 2898
- 1986Pub. L. 99–336, § 3(a), , 100 Stat. 637
- 1988Pub. L. 100–702, title X, § 1016(a), , 102 Stat. 4669
- 1990Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 312, , 104 Stat. 5114
- 1991Pub. L. 102–198, § 4, , 105 Stat. 1623
- 2002Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, § 11020(b)(3), , 116 Stat. 1827
- 2011Pub. L. 112–63, title I, § 103(a), , 125 Stat. 759.
Show as published
(June 25, 1948, ch. 646, 62 Stat. 937; Pub. L. 94–583, § 6, , 90 Stat. 2898; Pub. L. 99–336, § 3(a), , 100 Stat. 637; Pub. L. 100–702, title X, § 1016(a), , 102 Stat. 4669; Pub. L. 101–650, title III, § 312, , 104 Stat. 5114; Pub. L. 102–198, § 4, , 105 Stat. 1623; Pub. L. 107–273, div. C, title I, § 11020(b)(3), , 116 Stat. 1827; Pub. L. 112–63, title I, § 103(a), , 125 Stat. 759.)