Skip to content

Title 5 — Government Organization and Employees

Part III · Chapter 43 — Performance Appraisal

§ 4302. Establishment of performance appraisal systems

Statutory text

(a)

Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which—

(1)

provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees;

(2)

encourage employee participation in establishing performance standards; and

(3)

use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees.

(b)
(1)

The head of each agency, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the Special Counsel, shall develop criteria that—

(A)

the head of the agency shall use as a critical element for establishing the job requirements of a supervisory employee; and

(B)

promote the protection of whistleblowers.

(2)

The criteria required under paragraph (1) shall include—

(A)

principles for the protection of whistleblowers, such as the degree to which supervisory employees—

(i)

respond constructively when employees of the agency make disclosures described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 2302(b)(8);

(ii)

take responsible actions to resolve the disclosures described in clause (i); and

(iii)

foster an environment in which employees of the agency feel comfortable making disclosures described in clause (i) to supervisory employees or other appropriate authorities; and

(B)

for each supervisory employee—

(i)

whether the agency entered into an agreement with an individual who alleged that the supervisory employee committed a prohibited personnel practice; and

(ii)

if the agency entered into an agreement described in clause (i), the number of instances in which the agency entered into such an agreement with respect to the supervisory employee.

(3)

In this subsection—

(A)

the term “agency” means any entity the employees of which are covered under paragraphs (8) and (9) of section 2302(b), without regard to whether any other provision of this section is applicable to the entity;

(B)

the term “prohibited personnel practice” has the meaning given the term in section 2302(a)(1);

(C)

the term “supervisory employee” means an employee who would be a supervisor, as defined in section 7103(a), if the agency employing the employee was an agency for purposes of chapter 71; and

(D)

the term “whistleblower” means an employee who makes a disclosure described in section 2302(b)(8).

(c)

Under regulations which the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe, each performance appraisal system shall provide for—

(1)

establishing performance standards which will, to the maximum extent feasible, permit the accurate evaluation of job performance on the basis of objective criteria (which may include the extent of courtesy demonstrated to the public) related to the job in question for each employee or position under the system;

(2)

as soon as practicable, but not later than , with respect to initial appraisal periods, and thereafter at the beginning of each following appraisal period, communicating to each employee the performance standards and the critical elements of the employee’s position;

(3)

evaluating each employee during the appraisal period on such standards;

(4)

recognizing and rewarding employees whose performance so warrants;

(5)

assisting employees in improving unacceptable performance; and

(6)

reassigning, reducing in grade, or removing employees who continue to have unacceptable performance but only after an opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance.

(d)

In accordance with regulations which the Office shall prescribe, the head of an agency may administer and maintain a performance appraisal system electronically.

Legislative history

Reconstructed from this section’s Code source credit and amendment notes, resolved against the local Statutes at Large. Editorial notes are evidence, not the law that made the change.

  1. Pub. L. 89–554 · 80 Stat. 378

    Enacted · 5 U.S.C. § 4302

    Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 440

    Source evidence

    Code source credit
    Pub. L. 89–554, Sept. 6, 1966, 80 Stat. 440

  2. Pub. L. 95–454 title II § 203(a) · 92 Stat. 1111

    Substituted · 5 U.S.C. § 4302

    Pub. L. 95–454 substituted “Establishment of performance appraisal systems” for “Performance-rating plans; establishment of” in section catchline and in text substituted provisions relating to the establishment of a performance appraisal system, for provisions relating to the establishment of performance-rating plans

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Pub. L. 95–454 substituted “Establishment of performance appraisal systems” for “Performance-rating plans; establishment of” in section catchline and in text substituted provisions relating to the establishment of a performance appraisal system, for provisions relating to the establishment of performance-rating plans.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (a) Chapter 43 of title 5, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: “CHAPTER 43— PERFORMANCE APPRAISAL “SUBCHAPTER I—GENERAL PROVISIONS “Sec. “4301. Definitions. “4302. Establishment of performance appraisal systems. “4303. Actions based on unacceptable performance. “4304. Responsibilities of Office of Personnel Management. “4305. Regulations. “§4301. Definitions “For the purpose of this subchapter— “(1) ‘agency’ means— “(A) an Executive agency; “(B) the Administrative Office of the United States Courts; and “(C) the Government Printing Office; but does not include— “(i) a Government corporation; “(ii) the Central Intelligence Agency, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, or any Executive agency or unit thereof which is designated by the President and the principal function of which is the conduct of foreign intelligence or counterintelligence activities; or “(iii) the General Accounting Office; “(2) ‘employee’ means an individual employed in or under an agency, but does not include— “(A) an employee outside the United States who is paid in accordance with local native prevailing wage rates for the area in which employed; “(B) an individual in the Foreign Service of the United States; “(C) a physician, dentist, nurse, or other employee in the Department of Medicine and Surgery, Veterans’ Administration whose pay is fixed under chapter 73 of title 38; 38 USC 4101 et seq. “(D) an administrative law judge appointed under section 3105 of this title; “(E) an individual in the Senior Executive Service; “(F) an individual appointed by the President; or “(G) an individual occupying a position not in the competitive service excluded from coverage of this subchapter by regulations of the Office of Personnel Management; and “(3) ‘unacceptable performance’ means performance of an employee which fails to meet established performance standards in one or more critical elements of such employee’s position. “§4302. Establishment of performance appraisal systems “(a) Each agency shall develop one or more performance appraisal systems which— “(1) provide for periodic appraisals of job performance of employees; “(2) encourage employee participation in establishing performance standards; and “(3) use the results of performance appraisals as a basis for training, rewarding, reassigning, promoting, reducing in grade, retaining, and removing employees; “(b) Under regulations which the Office of Personnel Management shall prescribe, each performance appraisal system shall provide for— “(1) establishing performance standards which will, to the maximum extent feasible, permit the accurate evaluation of job performance on the basis of objective criteria (which may include the extent of courtesy demonstrated to the public) related to the job in question for each employee or position under the system; “(2) as soon as practicable, but not later than October 1, 1981, with respect to initial appraisal periods, and thereafter at the beginning of each following appraisal period, communicating to each employee the performance standards and the critical elements of the employee’s position; “(3) evaluating each employee during the appraisal period on such standards; “(4) recognizing and rewarding employees whose performance so warrants; “(5) assisting employees in improving unacceptable performance; and “(6) reassigning, reducing in grade, or removing employees who continue to have unacceptable performance but only after an opportunity to demonstrate acceptable performance. “§4303. Actions based on unacceptable performance “(a) Subject to the provisions of this section, an agency may reduce Removal or reduction in grade. in grade or remove an employee for unacceptable performance. “(b) (1) An employee whose reduction in grade or removal is proposed under this section is entitled to— “(A) 30 days’ advance written notice of the proposed action Notice. which identifies— “(i) specific instances of unacceptable performance by the employee on which the proposed action is based; and “(ii) the critical elements of the employee’s position involved in each instance of unacceptable performance; “(B) be represented by an attorney or other representative; Representation. “(C) a reasonable time to answer orally and in writing; and “(D) a written decision which— Written decision. “(i) in the case of a reduction in grade or removal under this section, specifies the instances of unacceptable performance by the employee on which the reduction in grade or removal is based, and “(ii) unless proposed by the head of the agency, has been concurred in by an employee who is in a higher position than the employee who proposed the action. “(2) An agency may, under regulations prescribed by the head of Extension of notice. such agency, extend the notice period under subsection (b) (1) (A) of this section for not more than 30 days. An agency may extend the notice period for more than 30 days only in accordance with regulations issued by the Office of Personnel Management. “(c) The decision to retain, reduce in grade, or remove an employee— “(1) shall be made within 30 days after the date of expiration of the notice period, and “(2) in the case of a reduction in grade or removal, may be based only on those instances of unacceptable performance by the employee— “(A) which occurred during the 1-year period ending on the date of the notice under subsection (b)(1)(A) of this section in connection with the decision; and “(B) for which the notice and other requirements of this section are complied with. “(d) If, because of performance improvement by the employee during the notice period, the employee is not reduced in grade or removed, and the employee’s performance continues to be acceptable for 1 year from the date of the advance written notice provided under subsection (b) (1) (A) of this section, any entry or other notation of the unacceptable performance for which the action was proposed under this section shall be removed from any agency record relating to the employee. “(e) Any employee who is a preference eligible or is in the competitive service and who has been reduced in grade or removed under this section is entitled to appeal the action to the Merit Systems Protection Board under section 7701 of this title. Post, p. 1138. “(f) This section does not apply to— “(1) the reduction to the grade previously held of a supervisor or manager who has not completed the probationary period under section 3321 (a) (2) of this title, 5 USC 3321. “(2) the reduction in grade or removal of an employee in the competitive service who is serving a probationary or trial period under an initial appointment or who has not completed 1 year of current continuous employment under other than a temporary appointment limited to 1 year or less, or “(3) the reduction in grade or removal of an employee in the excepted service who has not completed 1 year of current continuous employment in the same or similar positions. “§4304. Responsibilities of the Office of Personnel Management “(a) The Office of Personnel Management shall make technical Technical assistance. assistance available to agencies in the development of performance appraisal systems. “(b) (1) The Office shall review each performance appraisal system Review of performance appraisal system. developed by any agency under this section and determine whether the performance appraisal system meets the requirements of this subchapter. “(2) The Comptroller General shall from time to time review on a selected basis performance appraisal systems established under this subchapter to determine the extent to which any such system meets the requirements of this subchapter and shall periodically report its findings to the Office and to the Congress. “(3) If the Office determines that a system does not meet the requirements of this subchapter (including regulations prescribed under section 4305), the Office shall direct the agency to implement an appropriate system or to correct operations under the system, and any such agency shall take any action so required. “§4305. Regulations “The Office of Personnel Management may prescribe regulations to carry out the purpose of this subchapter.”.

    Effective date note
    Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after Oct. 13, 1978, see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

  3. Technical and Miscellaneous Civil Service Amendments Act of 1992

    Pub. L. 102–378 § 2(18) · 106 Stat. 1346

    Substituted · 5 U.S.C. § 4302(a)(3)

    Pub. L. 102–378 substituted a period for semicolon at end

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 102–378 substituted a period for semicolon at end.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (18) in section 4302(a) by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting a period;

  4. Pub. L. 106–398 § 1(dA) · 114 Stat. 1654

    Added · 5 U.S.C. § 4302(c)

    Pub. L. 106–398 added subsec. (c)

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–398 added subsec. (c).

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    SECTION 1. ENACTMENT OF FISCAL YEAR 2001 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT. The provisions of H.R. 5408 of the 106th Congress, as introduced on October 6, 2000, are hereby enacted into law.

  5. National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2018

    Pub. L. 115–91 div. A title X § 1097(d)(1) · 131 Stat. 1283

    1. Added · 5 U.S.C. § 4302(b)(d)

      Pub. L. 115–91 added subsec. (b)

    2. Redesignated · 5 U.S.C. § 4302(b)(d)

      Pub. L. 115–91 redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively

    Source evidence

    Code amendment note
    Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 115–91 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively.

    Enacted provision · exact public law section
    (1) Establishment of systems.— Section 4302 of title 5, United States Code, is amended— (A) by redesignating subsections (b) and (c) as subsections (c) and (d), respectively; and (B) by inserting after subsection (a) the following: “(b) (1) The head of each agency, in consultation with the Director of the Office of Personnel Management and the Special Counsel, shall develop criteria that— “(A) the head of the agency shall use as a critical element for establishing the job requirements of a supervisory employee; and “(B) promote the protection of whistleblowers. “(2) The criteria required under paragraph (1) shall include— “(A) principles for the protection of whistleblowers, such as the degree to which supervisory employees— “(i) respond constructively when employees of the agency make disclosures described in subparagraph (A) or (B) of section 2302(b)(8); “(ii) take responsible actions to resolve the disclosures described in clause (i); and “(iii) foster an environment in which employees of the agency feel comfortable making disclosures described in clause (i) to supervisory employees or other appropriate authorities; and “(B) for each supervisory employee— “(i) whether the agency entered into an agreement with an individual who alleged that the supervisory employee committed a prohibited personnel practice; and “(ii) if the agency entered into an agreement described in clause (i), the number of instances in which the agency entered into such an agreement with respect to the supervisory employee. “(3) In this subsection— “(A) the term ‘agency’ means any entity the employees of which are covered under paragraphs (8) and (9) of section 2302(b), without regard to whether any other provision of this section is applicable to the entity; “(B) the term ‘prohibited personnel practice’ has the meaning given the term in section 2302(a)(1); “(C) the term ‘supervisory employee’ means an employee who would be a supervisor, as defined in section 7103(a), if the agency employing the employee was an agency for purposes of chapter 71; and “(D) the term ‘whistleblower’ means an employee who makes a disclosure described in section 2302(b)(8).” .

5 of 6 references resolved to an enrolled provision · 1 partial

Notes

historicalAndRevision
Historical and Revision Notes
DerivationU.S. CodeRevised Statutes andStatutes at Large
 5 U.S.C. 2002.Sept. 30, 1950, ch. 1123, § 3, 64 Stat. 1098.

Standard changes are made to conform with the definitions applicable and the style of this title as outlined in the preface to the report.

Editorial Notes

Amendments1978–2017 · 4 rounds

2017

Subsecs. (b) to (d). Pub. L. 115–91 added subsec. (b) and redesignated former subsecs. (b) and (c) as (c) and (d), respectively.

2000

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 106–398 added subsec. (c).

1992

Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 102–378 substituted a period for semicolon at end.

1978

Pub. L. 95–454 substituted “Establishment of performance appraisal systems” for “Performance-rating plans; establishment of” in section catchline and in text substituted provisions relating to the establishment of a performance appraisal system, for provisions relating to the establishment of performance-rating plans.

Statutory Notes and Related Subsidiaries

Effective Date of 1978 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 95–454 effective 90 days after , see section 907 of Pub. L. 95–454, set out as a note under section 1101 of this title.

Annual Report to Congress on Unacceptable Performance in Whistleblower Protection

Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, § 1097(d)(3), , 131 Stat. 1620, provided that:

“(A)

Definitions.—

In this paragraph, the terms ‘agency’ and ‘whistleblower’ have the meanings given the terms in section 4302(b)(3) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1).

“(B)

Report.—

Each agency shall annually submit to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate, the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform of the House of Representatives, and each committee of Congress with jurisdiction over the agency a report that details—

“(i)

the number of performance appraisals, for the year covered by the report, that determined that an employee of the agency failed to meet the standards for protecting whistleblowers that were established under section 4302(b) of title 5, United States Code, as amended by paragraph (1);

“(ii)

the reasons for the determinations described in clause (i); and

“(iii)

each performance-based or corrective action taken by the agency in response to a determination under clause (i).”

Credits

1966–2017 · 5 acts
  1. 1966Pub. L. 89–554, , 80 Stat. 440
  2. 1978Pub. L. 95–454, title II, § 203(a), , 92 Stat. 1132
  3. 1992Pub. L. 102–378, § 2(18), , 106 Stat. 1347
  4. 2000Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title XI, § 1104], , 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–311
  5. 2017Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, § 1097(d)(1), , 131 Stat. 1619.
Show as published

(Pub. L. 89–554, , 80 Stat. 440; Pub. L. 95–454, title II, § 203(a), , 92 Stat. 1132; Pub. L. 102–378, § 2(18), , 106 Stat. 1347; Pub. L. 106–398, § 1 [[div. A], title XI, § 1104], , 114 Stat. 1654, 1654A–311; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title X, § 1097(d)(1), , 131 Stat. 1619.)

Parsed from the official OLRC USLM XML in data/usc_all/usc05.xml · release point 119-108 · OLRC build 2026-09-09

USLM identifier /us/usc/t5/s4302